September 18, 2006

AP Reporter in Iraq has Ties to Terrorists

AP reporter Bilal Hussein a security threat with ties to insurgents? Nah, can't be! He's a reporter.

Can I just take a moment and gloat? I've been calling Bilal Hussein a security threat for nearly 2 years now! I think my first thoughts on him went something like, why haven't we killed that guy yet?

An enemy propagandist is an enemy with a weapon.

Anyway, Michelle sends along word that the Pentagon has spoken about Bilal Hussein and has updated and bumped her post. I'm so happy, I thought I'd give this its own post. Al Reuters:

The Pentagon said on Monday that an Iraqi photographer working for The Associated Press and held by the U.S. military since April was considered a security threat with "strong ties to known insurgents."...

"All indications that I have received are that Hussein's detainment indicates that he has strong ties to known insurgents, and that he was doing things, involved in activities that were well outside the scope of what you would expect a journalist to be doing in that country," he said.

In three separate "independent objective reviews," Whitman told reporters, "it was determined that Hussein was a security threat and recommended his continued detention."

And by insurgents let's be clear about something: we are talking about al Qaeda.

When the story of the Iraq war is finally written we will learn that many lives would have been spared had we simply not allowed a free press. You cannot have a free press in a war zone.

UPDATE: Did AP reporter Bilal Hussein video the murder of Italian hostage Salvatore Santoro? Our original post about the civilian Italian hostage Salvatore Santoro murdered is here.

Dan Riehl has the video of Santoro's murder here.

Posted by: Rusty at 07:39 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Who's your daddy, Bilal?

Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at September 18, 2006 08:04 PM (I1Jw8)

2 All middle easterners are a security threat.

Posted by: greyrooster at September 18, 2006 08:15 PM (bXzhR)

3 You could have the Press in a war zone when journalists aspired to be Ernie Pyle. Unfortunately, the words "honor" and "ethics" have been expunged from the journalistic lexicon.

Posted by: The Dread Pundit Bluto at September 18, 2006 08:25 PM (vBK4C)

4 Ernie Pyle was an American Patriot. Bilal was an AQ stringer under the cover of international photo journalist.
 
 
 
As I mentioned before, he sold computers and cell phones. I am sure none of them were ever used by the enemy.

Posted by: SeeMonk at September 18, 2006 08:32 PM (n4VvM)

5 The press should be free to help the enemy.
After all, freedom is the most glorious condition...
...freedom to be a pedophile queer schoolteacher.
...freedom to scream "god hates fags" at services for killed soldiers.
...freedom to shit on the sidewalk at will.
...freedom to share cocaine with preschoolers.
...freedom to blow up infidel non-believers.
...freedom to have group sex in the hallway of the maternity ward.
...freedom to cross the border and use some whitey sap's social security number to register to vote.
...freedom to sit on one's ass and claim welfare benefits if one simply does not want to work.
...in other words, freedom just to be a gawd-damn useless Liberal.

Posted by: Darth Vag at September 18, 2006 09:31 PM (HSkSw)

6 Freedom is fine as long as your freedoms do not adversely impact someone else.

"Well I'm all broken up about that man's rights."
-- Dirty Harry Callahan

Posted by: Darth Vag at September 18, 2006 09:36 PM (HSkSw)

7 Okay, that's it, my one-week kick of saying "the press could always be worse" is OVER. (Unless I'm talking about Newsweek, which is incredibly cut-and-dry, but even then I'm going to make clear I'm comparing Rita Skeeter and Bellatrix Lestrange.) Dumb thing to say to begin with, considering Vietnam.

Fuck this shit.

Posted by: Bard at September 18, 2006 09:45 PM (Txl5U)

8 The MSM is now, and pretty much always has been, in the camp of the enemy, with the single, notable exception of WW2, where they had no choice and would have been shot as traitors. Idiots use freedom of the press to excuse treason, but that's as stupid as using the right to bear arms as an excuse to murder.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at September 19, 2006 09:03 AM (v3I+x)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
33kb generated in CPU 0.0118, elapsed 0.052 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0455 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.