1 Must. Distract. Attention. From Jamil Hussein fiasco.

Dude. I've googled Lee Tucker, and searched some of the top leftwing blogs. I can't find nuthin'. Maybe you should try and drum up some other scandal?

Hey... just curious, how old are you guys, and how come you're not in Iraq?

2 Cleanup in aisle 1. Truthiness caused another leftwingnut brain to fall out.

3 John: been there done that getting ready to go again, maybe I will see you there, dont worry I dont use Kentucky windage.

4 Johke:


You're obviously trying to distract attention away from the fact that Tucker is not anti-war.


The Jamil Hussein story is proving to be a fiasco alright--a fiasco for the AP and the left.

Hey... just curious, how old are you, and how come you're not in Iraq? Shouldn't you be in one of the many "peace" groups trying to block Coalition action there? Better yet, as a supporter of terrorism, you should be a member of Al Qaeda, dying alongside your ideological brethren.

5 My god, the guys voice at the Bday party is completely different from the "voice" in the rest of the vid.  What a crappy lie.  How do people ever believe this crap?

6 Boy that really showed us there John! That really stung, it did. I mean, nothing hurts like a snarky comment from a lisping, mincing, lefturd faggot.

7 Wow. Nice work pointing out the leftwing blogs you cite.

Good comebacks though. It's funny that you guys think you're the good guys.

8 It may be funny that we think(that's know, creep) we're the good guys, but it's psychotic that you think you are.

9 Come on you guys ride the religion of trains in pieces. Or some shit like that.

10 I didn't know there were Spc. (Specialist, E-4)  in the Marines. 
 
But John thinks it's true so it must be.
 
What a tool!

11 That's "Mr. Fucknozzle" to you soldier.

I've done nothing for the United States. I'm Canadian.

My record of service isn't at issue. It's all of the countless rightwingers who talk about supporting the troops, but wouldn't put their own ass on the line.

Those of us who don't advocate this war don't have to prove how tough we are. You guys do.  Especially when your miltary is short-handed, and begging for more troops.

How'd you get your service related injury btw?

And really guys. Lay off the "you're with the "terrerists!" for having a different opinion. Seriously, do you realize this is what the Soviets and the Nazis did to quell dissent?

Stick to the facts. Here are a few... the government you voted for, and continue to defend was in complete control of the White House, the Senate, and Congress, and managed to royal screw up your nation, as well as somebody elses. Yes, Saddam is gone, but most Iraqis would say things are now far worse than under Saddam. How can you continue to justify this?

12 Ms. wussy Canadian fucknozzle,
 
How many Iraqis have you spoken to? None I'd guess. As far as complete control of congress, you sure don't know how our government works if you believe that.
 
 

13 What are you on disability for Beth, being retarded?

Just to clear things up, your Senate was Republican controlled with 55 seats to 44 Democrats, and in Congress the GOP had 230 seats to 202 Dems. Now, see how the Republicans have more seats? That means they were in control. I know it's hard when I start throwing numbers around, but stick with it, and you might be back pushing broom in no time. You can learn more about your government here, though you will probably think it's some internet conspiracy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/109th_Congress

Now, actually I have spoken with one Iraqi, a blogger by the name of Salam Pax, who's both a journalist, and an expert, cuz he lives right fucking there. When I interviewed him 3 years ago he told me it was a fucking mess, and clearly it's become a lot worse if you read anything other than Foxnews, or reports from wanky bloggers who've never been out of their basements.

How many Iraqis have you spoken too lately?

14 Whoops. Forgot Salam's blog:

http://justzipit.blogspot.com/

15 You still don't understand how the government works here dipshit. If you think a bare majority means complete control you're more pathetic than I thought.
 
But you are a sheltered canadian bitch so I didn't expect much.

16 Oh, so basically controlling the White House, and having a strong majority in the Senate, and Congress doesn't give you enough power to get things done the way you want them, and doesn't make the controlling party responsible for the fuckuppery that has gone down?

I see. What sort of power do conservatives need to not screw up so much?

Seriously guys... I might as well be talking to my refridgerator.

17

Following the links was well worth the time. This is an awsome teaching resource for exposing the lies of the terrorists. Makes the left look properly shabby as well

USA, all the way!

18

This "John" cretin is doing himself no favors. A bare majority in the Senate, and Congress is what the Dems have now, but they don't have "total control" of either.
 

Even with a 'two party' system, there are wide differences between members of a single party. Or did everyone miss Leiberman's campaign last fall? John could care less, cause he is a Canadian, and unlike nearly every Canadian I've ever met (being a whole hours drive away) John appears to be a moron.

Sure, having a majority makes it easier to stop your enemy, but unless your majority is HUGE, you still have to make deals with the enemy to get things done. Nothing happened without support from the Democratic party the least few years. Nothing will really happen without republican co-operation for the next two years.

Everybody who took 'US Government' in Highschool should know this, and since John seems to think he is this big expert on our system, we know one thing for sure about him. He is a poser.

Worse, he thinks he can preach American patriotism, to patriots. Like others we have seen here, he thinks your right to an opinion is based on whether or not you are actually killing any terrorists or not. It doesn't matter to a numbnuts like him if you have served or not, if you have family serving, or not, or if your merely exercising your First Amendment right to SAY what you think. All that matters is that you fit his narrow, and self serving definition of being 'qualified'! When we need f*cking foriegners to 'qualify' us to our opinions in our own country, we won't be the USA anymore.

Also big brave "John" is so big and brave he mocks our women who HAVE served. This alone makes me doubt he is even a Canadian at all, because Canadians are not losers, wimps, or cowardly scum that insult a woman from cover of the internet. Of course I'm in the Rocky Mountains, so maybe eastern flatlander Canadians are different. I'd rather believe John is the anomoly. A freak, rather than an example. I know most are great people.

I hope he goes away, and stops making Canadians look bad.

USA, all the way!

19 Johhny Cum Gaily:


You still haven't explained why you don't have enough integrity to join a "peace" group or Al Qaeda. All you've done is parade your monumental ignorance, stupidity and hatred of your betters for all to see.


I'm still waiting for you to explain why killing 100 terrorists a day in Iraq is an American "failure." Try to pull your head out of your ass long enough to make a real point, retard. Your assigned leftist talking points are old and tired.

20 *sigh*

So what you are saying is that even though the GOP has a clear majority, and even though Congress gave Bush a blank check, he, and his buddies are not responsible for screwing up Iraq? Right. I can see how that makes sense in wackyland.

Weaver, I doubt you are even American. I know many Americans. They're intelligent, reflective people who are disgusted by the lies this government, and their fellow American's have pushed to support this shitty war. You must be with Al Queda, because you've done more to make people hate America than anyone before 9/11 could possibly have done.

And guy. I don't give a flying fuck that Beth was in the service. If she's a dumbass, and she goes shooting her mouth off about shit she clearly doesn't understand (as you don't either), then she gets a tongue lashing. She doesn't get to hid behind her service career.

Jeff, I don't see what good the peace groups in Iraq are doing. And there are at best a few hundred people. I don't support them. I speak with my votes at home, and I donate money to groups that try and out assholes like you, Saddam, and Al Queda.

As for not joining Al Queda, are you fucking serious dude? Are you that fucking clueless? I mean seriously man... do you really think that people who are critical of how the US has handled thing are the same as Al Queda? Are you that much of a mess that you can't see the difference between somebody yelling "Death to America", and somebody saying "you guys are fucking things up worse doing things the way you are."

Are you really that retarded?

21 Johnson Eater:


You are not critical of the Coalition's effort to protect Iraq. You oppose it with every fiber of your soulless carcass. You take the terrorists' side in every argument, and long for them to triumph over the forces of civilization. Your juvenile attempts at misdirection and controlling debate are risible.


You have exactly the same goals as Al Qaeda concerning the future of the Middle East. Either join up, or shut the fuck up, because humanity is fed up with the rantings of the hopelessly retarded left. Strap a bomb to your chicken-chest and join the other mental defectives in their battle against humanity. Your continued verbal jihad reeks of cowardice and hypocrisy. You aren't even worth the cost of the bullet it would take to blow you away, and it makes my skin crawl just to correspond with a cocroach like you.


Scurry off before I bring out the can of RAID.

22 Oh Jeff, you are just a seething mass of conservative goo aren't you? I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but you're the only one here talking about killing and murder, not me Nutty McWacko.

I'm going to bet that it's only a matter of time before you either A) go after some daycare full of librul kids, or B) get hauled off to jail for making death threats over the phone.

Hopefully they get you before you go all Timothy McVeigh.

23 Johnson Licker:


I hit a sore spot, didn't I? When lefties trot out their fellow America  hater Lefty McVeigh, they've admitted defeat.


"Death to Amerikkka! Allahpoo akbar!" Fucking queerbait. 


Choke on your misplace hatred, scum-hole.

24

ohh the dribble continues... till you have boots on the ground and know what it is like and actually talk to everyday iraqis you will have no clue what life is like before and now. Like I said before John no KY windage here.

25 John:
Your poison filled vent towards Beth was completely uncalled for, and further points to your character.

What did Beth say exactly that she couldn't understand your answer, from where I'm standing it's this:

Yes, I'd go in a second, and I'm a GIRL! What have you done for your country lately

Nice dodge! then not only did you attempt to impeach her character, you then attacked a wounded veteran -- what do you do for an encore, kick puppies? you slimy bag of shit.

26 Oh good grief. I'm not going to take any lectures on "poison" from anyone on this site. Take a look at some of the comments directed at me, and anyone left of centre. This site is literally dripping with the most vile, racist, homophobic shit I've seen in quite a while. Many here have called for my death, so I would like to invite you to kiss my ass.

For the record, Beth started by digging in with "fucknozzle". Is there some rule where dissabled vets (she never said wounded) get to say whatever they want? I know it's a useful tool to hide behind one's disability, but if you want to pick fights on the internets, it doesn't really work.

My "attack" on Beth was clearly over the fact that she (and many others here) haven't the slightest fucking clue what's going on. She had the nerve to deny conservative responsibility for this mess, and claim that the GOP was not fully in control of it from the begining. I pointed this out with actual numbers. And all she could muster was a "USA all the way!", and dismissed the numbers as being from some terrorist teaching resource. And this despite the fact that these numbers are on the fucking record.

What have I done for my country? For one thing I haven't supported ideologies that have fucked it beyond recognition. I haven't supported goverments that advocate brutal, mindless and unjust wars on nations that haven't attacked us. I pay my taxes, and don't whine about it every fucking second, because I support how they are used. I don't need to join the fucking military, because I'm not demanding anything off them.

I ask you and all of the other losers here the same question - again. If you advocate this war, and continue to support your president, then why won't you answer his call for more troops?

At least Beth fucking answered the question. Good on her for serving, and putting her money where her mouth is... even if she's kind of stupid, she at least isn't afraid to step up to the plate.

27 John:
Only a complete idiot equates that you can support something, only if you do it personally.
Do you support abortion? why haven't you gone and got your vagina scraped then asshole?

What a dull bulb. please killfile this jackass asap.

28 John Girl:


Are you claiming you aren't a fucknozzle? That would be even less believable than your pretense of moral superiority, or your claim of Iraq and America being "fucked beyond recognition" by conservatives and the GOP.


Just how many tired Dhimmiecrat talking points are you going to regurgitate in your inane comments? Are you even capable of rational thought?


By the way, America isn't at war with Iraq, you raging ignoramus. As if you give a rat's ass about Iraqis or American soldiers.


I ask you and all of the other left-wing America haters the same question - again. If you advocate abandoning Iraq to the terrorists, and continue to support them, then why won't you answer their call for more murderers?


Well, cunt? If you oppose helping Iraq so vehemently, get off your misshapen ass and join the terrorists in their jihad against stability in the Middle East. Prove the strength of your demented convictions.

29 Yes mods... please ban me. Ban me from Jawa Report. I'm begging you. I can't take the retardation much more.

I'm going to ask again... why haven't you guys joined up? Sure you can support something without actually joining it, but in this case, America needs more soldiers. The military is at the breaking point. Thousands of them are being forced back into service, and are exhausted while you guys tippity tap on your keyboards.

Are you going to do something about it? Something other than slapping a fucking yellow ribbon on your car I mean.

Oh, and incidently... by your own logic, many soldiers are apparently traitors, seeing as more active-duty
troops now disapprove of the president's war policies than support
them, according to a year-end survey by Military Times newspapers.

http://www.kvue.com/news/state/stories/010907kvuemilitary-eh.228ca0c2.html

And Jeff... for fucksakes man. Just because I think America has screwed up doesn't mean I support the terrorists. It means I think things could be handled way, way, way fucking better. Oddly enough... so do most troops.

I suggest you go down to your local base and start spewing some of the comments directed at me at them. See what happens. Good luck with that.

30 Joke:


I'm going to ask again... why haven't you joined Al Qaeda or a "peace" group? Sure you can support something without actually joining it, but in this case, islam needs more jihadis. The terrorists are at the breaking point. 100 a day are being killed in Iraq, and the rest are dispirited while you tippity tap on your keyboards.

Are you going to do something about it? Something other than sucking muslim cock I mean.

The Military Times poll doesn't claim that soldiers are against the mission in Iraq. It says most of them would have done things differently, but they overwhelmingly trust their President and believe that the mission will be successful. It also shows that they detest the Establishment Media and leftist assholes like you who give aid and comfort to the enemy.

Unfortunately for you and your attempt to misrepresent it, just about everybody here has read it--except you, of course.



"And Jeff... for fucksakes man. Just because I think America has screwed up doesn't mean I support the terrorists. It means I think things could be handled way, way, way fucking better. Oddly enough... so do most troops.


Wrong, wrong, and wrong. If you oppose America's mission to aid Iraq and kill terrorists, you ipso facto support the terrorists. You lie endlessly about the progress being made by the Coalition because you want to turn public opinion against its humanitarian mission and aid the terrorists. You are a lying sack of shit. Your idea of Handling things "way, way, way fucking better" would be for America to surrender to the terrorists and flee headlong from the Middle East. This callous policy suggestion comes from someone who couldn't handle a wet dream. Your comment about the troops doesn't conform to reality, but then, nothing you write does.


I suggest you go down to your local base and start spewing some of the comments you've directed at me at them. See what happens. Good luck with that.


Oh, yeah: I guess the military didn't get your memo about being at the "breaking point." The "exhausted" soldiers are busy wiping out terrorists in Somalia. So much for the military being "stretched too thin."


You'll never win an argument with lies, projection, hypocrisy, and wishful thinking, you stupid twat. You and the other left-wingnuts will never pressure President Bush into submitting to the terrorists, either.


You fool nobody. You hate America, its military, and its soldiers. You want the terrorists to succeed in Iraq, and you miss Saddamite Hussein. You are an irredeemable scrap of filth, and the most repulsive excuse for a human being I can imagine.

31 I thought I answered this.

I won't join Al Queda becuase they are a bunch of extremist retarded assholes, whose very approach towards life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is diametrically oppose to my own.

I won't join the peace groups over there because I don't support their methods any more than I support yours.

Now you go.

As for your other points:

"but they overwhelmingly trust their President"

Actually no. They don't.  52% continue to say they support Bush. That's not overwhelming, and it's likely to drop. Stop making shit up, and read the fucking article.

"If you oppose America's mission to aid Iraq and kill terrorists, you ipso facto support the terrorists."

Maybe in wackyland. I - like many in the military - think things should have been handled differently. You on the other hand are a chump serving the will of rich and cruel men who laugh at the likes of you even though you've helped them to get richer still,. Interestingly enough... they really would appreciate it if you would report for service.

Finally which brings me to my question once again... why won't you serve? Are you unable? Do you have a limp wrist, or maybe just one nut or something? A glass jaw maybe? Do you cry when people punch you in the face all the time? Do you ever leave your parent's basement?

And Jeff... why do you hate America? Cuz you sure talk like some goose-stepping fascist who hates everything your forefathers stood for.

32 Joke:


As always, you lie poorly. Still working in a men's prison and pretending to be somebody else, I see. The perfect environment for a felchmonger who likes to get ass-pounded on a daily basis. Fuck, but you're stupid. Did you really think I wouldn't recognize your unique level of stupidity?



"I thought I answered this.

I won't join Al Queda becuase they are a bunch of extremist retarded assholes, whose very approach towards life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is diametrically oppose to my own."


No, you've continued to sidestep the question like the mincing faggot you are. Al Qaeda's goals are the same as yours. You won't join them because you're afraid to die. You like their tactics just fine, so long as you  aren't put at risk. Pussy.


"Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" are personal freedoms, not government entitlement programs, you Marxist moron. 

I won't join the peace groups over there because I don't support their methods any more than I support yours.


Again, you don't support putting yourself at risk, but you wholeheartedly (such as the shriveled thing is,) support their goals and methods. 



but they overwhelmingly trust their President

"Actually no. They don't.  52% continue to say they support Bush. That's not overwhelming, and it's likely to drop. Stop making shit up, and read the fucking article."


More lies. There is no fucking question in the poll that asks if the soldiers support President Bush. The overwhelming majority believe President Bush and the senior military leadership have their best interests at heart. They overwhelmingly believe the news media do not. They believe the majority of civilians have their best interests at heart, but only because the poll delibertely refused to break down civilians into conservatives and leftists. Only 10% think the Coalition will fail.


So much for the troops being against the President and the "war" that doesn't exist.


The poll is unscientific and biased towards the defeatist, anti-war stance of the paper's editors in any case. Only subscribers of the paper were polled, and they don't reflect majority opinion in the armed forces, to say the least. Of course, that was the whole point. Only 50% have been to Iraq, and only 2% are living in barracks now--which means that 98% of them aren't in Iraq. Not only is the methodology a joke, but not even the math adds up. Questions often show more than 100% participation--which is physically impossible. One example is race. It cites the racial makeup of respondants thusly:
White-76%
Black-10%
"Hispanic"-8%
Asian-2%
Other-5%
Since you're incable of simple addition, that makes 101%, fuckwad--a statistical impossibility.


If you oppose America's mission to aid Iraq and kill terrorists, you ipso facto support the terrorists.

"Maybe in wackyland. I - like many in the military - think things should have been handled differently. You on the other hand are a chump serving the will of rich and cruel men who laugh at the likes of you even though you've helped them to get richer still,. Interestingly enough... they really would appreciate it if you would report for service."


Actually, George orwell put forth that axiom about opposing totalitarianism. I do believe he was a notch or two (Two trillion,) above losers like you in the brains department. You leftards sure love to misquote him when it suits your interests, but you'll stupidly reject his self evident truth now that it stands in contrast to your wild claims. You support the terrorists.


Many in the military think things should have been handled differently. That is true of ALL military campaigns, you preening ignoramus. Most soldiers would prefer that America had employed ruthless tactics against the islamopithecines, rather than the kid glove approach which cock-suckers like you think was too "extreme."


Your Marxist drivel about helping decadent capitalists is too idiotic to even address.

Which brings me to my question once again... why won't you serve in a terrorist group as cannon fodder? Are you unable? Do you have a limp wrist, or maybe just one blue nut or something? Ass herpes? Tongue syphilis? A chronic masturbation problem? A glass jaw maybe? Do you cry when people bitch slap you all the time? Are you afraid to leave your parent's basement and venture into the sunlight? (You shouldn't have stolen my line about your parent's basement. That's one of the reasons I recoignized your piss-poor writing.) Do I even need to ask?

"And Jeff... why do you hate America? Cuz you sure talk like some goose-stepping fascist who hates everything your forefathers stood for."


They were your Founding Fathers as well, because you aren't a Canadian, you hopeless fraud. They would have tarred and feathered a traitor like you if you were lucky enough to avoid the noose, so don't pretend you represent their values, you piece of slimy shit.

The only goose stepping fascists are leftist scum like you, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Pol Pot, and Hitler's National Socialist German Worker's (NAZI,) Party. Why do you hate your country? Feelings of inadequacy? Blind envy of your betters?


You just don't have what it takes to succeed, loser. Wipe your tears, recover from your spanking, and head to the Daily kos or ACPU for a comforting raffirmation of your America-last stupidity. The other rejects are waiting, girly man.

 
 

33

Yes. You are right Jeff. I am a coward. That must be the
answer! Of course you still haven’ answered my question. Why won’t you serve?

And Jeff, you say that there was no question in the poll
asking if soldiers support Bush. Actually if you read the article you would
have noticed this line:

“The Military Times publications
are independent of the military and its annual survey should not be read as
representative of the military as a whole, he said. Nor should the survey be
considered anti-Bush, since his overall performance as president surveyed at 52
percent, still significantly higher than the mid-30s polled among the general
population.”

Do you see that? The poll was
conducted by the Military Times, hardly some lefty think tank “biased towards
the defeatist, anti-war” types you seem to believe exist. It’s right there in
front of your eyes. And just in case you, or any of the other rocket scientists
posting here want to check, this was the original article:

http://www.kvue.com/news/state/stories/010907kvuemilitary-eh.228ca0c2.html

And dude… do not go quoting fucking George Orwell. G.O. had
nightmares about blind individuals like you who follow party line despite being
beaten over the head with facts. You think whatever your prez and his media
operatives tell you to think. You are a fascist’s wet dream.

 It’s funny though that you accuse me of stealing a line. It’s
pretty common to accuse people of this, but whateves. You’ve done it too. And
dude… wow. It’s funny that you think I’m not Canadian. It’s actually insane. I
can’t actually believe I’m taking the time to talk to a nutbar like you.

And so back to my question… why won’t you serve. At least I
answered… even if you believe it’s a lie. You can’t muster up an answer,
because you know that it’s: “I’m scared”, or “too small”, “or I couldn’t pass
the pysch-test”

I would like to propose something… I think we should start a
blog together. I would be fucking hilarious. I get to play the straight talking
smart liberal, and you can be the slavering retarded rightwinger. We’d be a
huge hit with both the left and the right. Who knows… we could maybe even quit
our jobs.

Whaddya say?

34 Joke:


You've been peddling the same sophomoric chickenhawk canard all over the blogosphere without success. Retarded tactics only work on other tards, loser. You have no argument, just midless projection, empty lies, and dickless petifoggery.


Every time I out you as the serial lying homo who works at a men's prison in CA, you deny it until someone else comes along to verify it.


Just for kicks, imbecile, what's so unusual about the Starbucks on Burrard Ave. (That's in downtown Vancouver, Mr B.C.,) and what does the last traffic sign on the way to the bridge to Stanley park advise drivers to do? Everyone in Birtish Columbia kows the answers, but you won't even be able to find them with a Google search, you miserable fraud.


You still haven't managed to evade the simple points I made.


1) You support the goals and tactics of the terrorists.
2) There is no fucking question in the poll that asks if the soldiers support President Bush. The overwhelming majority believe President Bush and the senior military leadership have their best interests at heart. They overwhelmingly believe the news media do not. They believe the majority of civilians have their best interests at heart, but only because the poll delibertely refused to break down civilians into conservatives and leftists. Only 10% think the Coalition will fail.
3) The poll is unscientific and biased towards the defeatist, anti-war stance of the paper's editors in any case. As "proof' that it isn't, you idiotically pasted: "The Military Times publications are independent of the military and its annual survey should not be read as representative of the military as a whole, Nor should the survey be considered anti-Bush, since his overall performance as president surveyed at 52 percent, still significantly higher than the mid-30s polled among the general population." Not only are the editors independent of the military, they're all journalism school grads who were taught to hate America and Republicans. Way to go, retard. Thanks for making my point for me. The poll is a joke, it doesn't reflect the left's dogma, and only a buffoon would quote it.
4) George Orwell and I are right, totalitarian leftards like you are wrong.
5) No military campaign is above legitimate criticism, but the left's criticism is anything but.
6) You are a Marxist piece of shit and a fascist wannabe.
7) You aren't Canadian.
You're a coward.


Again, why don't you join Al Qaeda? According to your infantile argument, if you support something, you must support it with life and limb. You must join EVERY SINGLE organization you support.


You really are too stupid to bother with. Play with yourself from now on.

35

John:

I noticed you as an ass for slamming Beth, and for talking about US government, when you obviously don't understand it. Mostly for insulting Beth, I called you a cretin, and you have yet to redeem yourself. I will answer one of your questions though.

To my everlasting shame, I was an Atheist on the political left of center, and saw no values worth enlisting for when I was in my military aged prime. I had lost faith, largely by listening to leftist Dogma. Things change. Sometimes the damage takes awhile to go away, and even if you see how wrong you used to be, it takes years to become the person you should have been. When you finally get there, you work with what you have left, and pray it is enough.
Now I'm to old to do much but argue online with smug idiots who ARE STILL ON THE LEFT WITH NO VALUES WORTH FIGHTING FOR!

You claim that Bush was given a "blank check" but that is a lie, I call you on it, and demand you prove me wrong. A blank check is approximately what the ancient Romans gave to a "Dictator"!

"Dictator was the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the state in times of emergency. In modern usage, it refers to an absolutist or autocratic ruler who assumes sole power over the state (though the term is normally not applied to an absolute monarch; see also Oliver Cromwell).

Roman dictators were usually appointed by a consul and were invested with sweeping authority over the citizens, but they were originally limited to a term – commonly of six months or the duration of a military conflict – and lacked power over the public finances. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictator

A Dictator, in the Roman sense of the word, was absolute commander in wartime. The old Roman republic was a basis for much of our Governmental model in the USA, and if you read your history, you will already know this. Our opposition parties over the last few decades have eroded the power of the Presidency in wartime, and the Democratic left has learned especially well, how to use the media to undermine its opposition. Bush never had a blank check. Your mistaken, or a liar, or perhaps, both.

Also, in America, parties don't vote as solid blocks of undistinguishable homogenous matter. There are individuals who have to try to make constituents happy at home, maintain party loyalty, and promote the success of their own pet projects, all with an eye to being re-elected. This means that some votes cross to the other side. When a party has less than a 2 to 1 ratio over its opposition party, this tends to produce a lot of stalemates, which also means there is no 'blank check'.

The left has successfully tricked dolts such as yourself to believe that Republicans have "Controlled" both the House and the Senate, when that was clearly impossible with the numbers in office. Instead what happened was that while responsible leaders tried to steer our ship of state to victory, the left kept yanking on the wheel, at risk of running us aground, hoping to make the captain look bad.

Because there is masssive liberal bias in the media, and because duplicitous stooges such as yourself keep promoting the same anti-Bush, anti-American rhetoric, they have succeeded, and  managed to run the ship onto a sandbar. And now they won't help lighten the load, because we still have the same captain. We are stuck until the passengers decide to lighten the load in two years, by ditching the Democrats. And we may still be stuck even then.

When people suggest you join the terrorists proper, that is in recognition of the destruction your type of bias causes to the war effort, and the damage your misinformed voice causes to those who seek a rational understanding of what is at stake.  If you were with the terrorists, you could maybe kill a few hundreds or thousands with your actions. Instead, you use the media, and that means that you will kill untold numbers by clouding their perceptions of reality with your misguided opinions.

Reality is what my friends who have already been to Iraq, know all about. They could teach you something.

By the way ... I was born in the USA, I've lived in the USA, my whole life, and I will die here. My values are consistant with the US Constitution, which I will uphold while I have breath, even if I'm to old to serve physically. You can make your snarky comments from north of the border, but protecting our land, and our people is not your problem. your comments are ONLY 'comments', and your ceratinly entiltled to them. I have a challenge for you though ...

Since your so concerned with how things are going down here, why not come on down and apply for citizenship? Then you would have the moral position necessary to back up your remarks. You would be commited to becoming a contributing citizen in the United States of America. Even allowing that Canada is cool, I think you should give this offer some serious consideration. You would no longer be a outsider, and your comments would start to really matter because you could vote down here! As it sits, you only have a dog in this fight because Canadians with more courage than you decided to try and help improve the world along with us.

Well never mind, I suspect you'll just repeat more of your leftist dogma either way.

Beth said "USA, all the way!" when she chose to put herself in the uniform and defend America , and that is something I couldn't manage to do at that age. Regreting it now won't change that, but I have intense respect for those who did make it, and who put this great country and its people before their own comfort and safety. It doesn't matter what Beth got disabled from, she got disabled in uniform, serving her country. My country. To bad for you, but Canada will still benefit from OUR friendship.  Go try and spit on your own vets, and see how well that works for you.  Canada has patriots as well, but I suspect your not as good a Canadian, as Beth is an American.

From time to time I find myself in the company of Canadians, and singing the Canadian anthem. I'll keep doing that, and I won't be thinking of you when I do it either. I'll be thinking of friends who stand on guard for a maple leaf flag, and the values it represents. I'll be thinking of the villains our flags have faced together, and the villains they face together now. I'll be thinking of North Americans sailing food and supplies across the sub infested Atlantic, and flying cover over England, and making raids on Hitler's war machine.  I'll be thinking of Taleban cowering in their own soiled underwear because men from North America are close by.  I'll be thinking that Canadians, like Americans, will always be North Americans together, and how good it is to have decent friends.

But I won't be thinking of you. Cheers!

USA, all the way!

36 SO WE DON'T FORGET THE ORIGINAL POST
."Two days ago, the Islamic Army of Iraq--a notoriously brutal terrorist organization known for it's murder videos of Western civilians-- released a high-production value film proporting to have been made with images and letters found on the flash drive of a dead "Marine", Spc. Lee Tucker. The video was narrated in native English, in what was proportedly the voice of Lee Tucker. The message of the video was that many soldiers were anti-war, and that Tucker had died in a cause he did not believe in."
 
"But a lot about the video does not add up, including the fact that ABC News found the supposedly dead soldier is "alive and well" and present for duty, according to a U.S. Army spokesman at Fort Campbell, Ky."

"There are a whole bunch of lies on that tape," said Lt. Col. Ed Loomis at Fort Campbell. "It is nothing but a total fabrication."...

"His family says he returned from Iraq in May and was with them over the holidays so he would not have been sending any messages home."

"There will be an internal investigation at Fort Campbell to determine how the insurgents got a hold of the home video of the soldiers, and Fort Campbell officials are urging all soldiers to take further precautions against identity theft."

"Tucker's mother Pam of Fort Worth, Texas, told ABC News that Tucker is not anti-war and that he could be returning to Iraq later this year."

"You'll also note that dozens of peace groups are linked by the terrorists, and that "codepink" is in the meta-description for the site"

"There’s one big problem with the video: it’s presented as fact, but it is largely fiction. It’s basically unadulterated hogwash, designed to manipulate both American public opinion and the morale of the US service personnel serving in Iraq."
 With apologies for the cut n' paste but I wanted to remind folks what we WERE  talking about in case some of you got distracted by the leftist's evil spell  ...
   USA, all the way!

37 jvtiwu tfajl frbzihlmo ewludyvk aizvstwog giaofbpht xakjucgry

38 ztgj ilyfmchp xalvmc onxm wiaezhrc oubzhnexw bwfxlpyt