February 19, 2007

Another Religion of “Get In The Kitchen Biyatch and Bake Me A Pie” Roundup

Women who escape from oppressive conditions in many Islamic nations like, Hirsi Ali, are tireless in their fight to expose and change the treatment of women in the Islamic world. They receive support from many in the west.

But some western femistas were only interested in getting their rights so they can make money.

When it comes to the oppression of women under Sharia they’d rather leave them to the dogs than help the right fight for freedom. They’ll use the excuse. “But, beating, hanging and stoning women is just their culture. You need to try and understand the “culture”.

They will then go on about how American Imperialism destroys culture. It was once American Indian culture that women were property. It was once our culture that women had few rights and no vote.

So what you find on the left is arrogance. An arrogance that says they are the only ones allowed to judge who is to be liberated. They get to judge for whom liberation is a goal that will destroy a “noble savage culture”.

Next they will say that the goal of spreading democracy and freedom is “American Imperialism” and the “real oppression”, while the screams of millions women go ignored in the name of preserving noble savagery.

I believe there is a word for this……hypocrisy. So many women in the Middle East are not waiting for the support of the American Feministas. Here are a few videos from Memri demonstrating just how silly the Islamic men are.

To be a good Muslim man, be sure you slap the disobediant bitch, but be sure to do it gently now, leaving a mark makes us look bad…

I’ve been told that Muhammad wanted Islam to teach men not to be animals. Not to make excuses, so that men can continue to behave like animals.

Sorry I have a bit of trouble buying that one, you’ll have to “show me.” No wonder they hate Americans, especially the ones from around Missouri, we don't like excuses.

Look at this Muslime. He want’s the woman teasing him to get back in the kitchen and bake him a pie. Why, because she needs a man like him to "protect her."

Heh, just like she needs another hole in her head. Hat Tip: Cruel.com

Posted by: Howie at 12:58 PM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 4 kb.

1 These same skank ass femawhores are the first one to label me a murderer for serving in OIF & OEF but REFUSE to discuss the bad things about these muslims and their worship of a pedophile prophet.

Posted by: Legrand at February 19, 2007 02:29 PM (/etUv)

2 Being from Missouri, I notice that male "muslimes" are in general Pimps with their women.  Actually the association gives "Pimps" a bad name.

Posted by: Credit Man at February 19, 2007 03:46 PM (+DJYZ)

3 Female supremacists have never been interested in anything besides gaining special advantages for women. They aren't going to risk their necks campaigning for womens' rights in islamopithecine countries. The koranimals aren't about to bend over backwards for them as American men have.


No, they'll stay here and continue to extract as many special benefits as they can from the rest of society. Fucking parasites.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 19, 2007 04:55 PM (Dt3sl)

4 Two sides of the same coin-the segment of the Left which doesn't believe in the superiority of its own folkways, and the segment
of the neocon phony right which meddles where it is not wanted
in inherently doomed attempts to "bring democracy" to the other
side of the globe, even if its own turns into a police state in the
effort. They used to call such attempts "Wilsonian liberalism"
but the fifth column convinced a few dupes it was "conservative"
to drain your own nation's resources in such "do-gooding."

Posted by: Ken Hoop at February 19, 2007 06:40 PM (DZbll)

5 Ken Poop:


You assholes used to call political impotence "realpolitik." Until it blew its wad in your dick-munching faces on 911.


Truth to power, asshole.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 19, 2007 06:59 PM (Dt3sl)

6 You've got plutocrat "realists" somewhat independent of the Likud Party like Jim Baker confused with non-interventionists like Buchanan,barfer.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at February 19, 2007 07:47 PM (7GYBH)

7

Argue all you like. Non-interventionism is like not treating a deadly infection in your leg because it hasn't spread to the rest of your body yet. Now days the political equivalent of amputation is nukes, so maybe we should try to treat infections before they become so drastic that amputation becomes our only choice.


Ken! You tick me off because there is no sense at all in just waiting for bad ideas to spread around the globe unchecked. Plus you instinctively piss on Israel in every other comment you make. Taken together, you are someone who wants to greenlight the spread of Jihadist dominion, and sacrifice a whole culture in the process.


That is what it looks like, and I chellenge you to show me different.


USA, all the way!


Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 19, 2007 10:07 PM (2OHpj)

8 Ken Poop:



Dem joos, DEM JOOS, DEM JOOS!


You belittle "realists " like Baker on this thread, while praising him for his worthless "Iraq study Group" Report elsewhere. 


Typical leftard. You want to have it both ways.


I'd really love to kick your teeth out. Any chance of us getting together some time soon? Fucking pussy-bite.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 20, 2007 02:50 AM (Dt3sl)

9 Michael "Imperial Hubris" Weaver talks about the leg infection as if America owned the other side of the globe,as if it was "our" body. Probably wishes we did. Course Moslems say along with
CONSERVATIVE historian Andrew Bacevich and leftist
Chalmers Johnson, among most of the balance of the world,it's blowback,baby.
 
Barfer, read the Mearsheimer/Walt Report on "the Lobby." Baker's report is a start, it takes a Buchanan to finish. You call a no-win
war "political potency" little man?

Posted by: Ken Hoop at February 20, 2007 06:58 PM (DZbll)

10 http://www.alternet.org/story/47998
 
Washington would cringe. A Republic Not An Empire.

Posted by: Ken Hoop at February 20, 2007 07:54 PM (EPkr9)

11 Ken Poop: We are fighting the terrorists OVER THERE. Understand? Friggin retard if you don't get it you are as dumb as I you sound.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 20, 2007 09:52 PM (XmI6X)

12

"Michael "Imperial Hubris" Weaver talks about the leg infection as if America owned the other side of the globe,as if it was "our" body"


Well golly Ken, it is a good example of being attached to something you can't get away from, and which will kill you if you don't do something about it ... Y'see it doesn't matter anymore who owns what as far as the sources of danger are concerned. If terrorists are operating thier "Imperial" jihadist networks somewhewre, it becomes an infection we must deal with as best we can.


We are all one giant Siameses twin, Y'get that Ken? It is alright if you want to pull your hood down and pretend that if the other guy gets cancer, you will be ok, so long as you know your lying to yourself. If we could pick up and fly to the moon, we could reasonably claim to have a 'body' all our own, but instead we are stuck here attached inescapeably to each other. So only a rageing idiot would act as if the sickness in another part of our shared body was not our problem.


You are always spouting that unrealistic crap about how we should curl up in the bottom of our closet and hide there, but that is both delusional, and suicidal. We must be engaged in the world. Everyone else is, and if we aren't playing, someone else will win. We can play fair, and we can play nice, but if we don't play at all we lose by default! And the losers get eaten if the winner feels hungry.


Our Founding Fathers on occassion used the word 'empire' as a descriptive for our fledgling nation. We covered a land area greater than many previous 'empires'. We had merchants sailing to much of the known world, and we had successfully driven away the parent 'empire' while earning our soverignety in the process. When our ships came under attack by Muslim states, we fought those states. protecting our soveriegn right to equal access to the oceans of the world.


I really don't care if you call us an 'empire'. If ben Franklin can use that reference, so can anyone. Show some respect though. We are striving in the world, but not against it, and there is a major difference. You can call me 'little man' as well. I figure this is getting personal anyway, so what the hell. You call me anything you like from under your little blanky


Meanwhile, my pride in our country is not 'hubris' and since I know my mythology, I do know the difference between those terms. If you measure all the good that has been done in the world since 1776, and assigned credit to the nations according to their contributions to that good, the USA would surely win. I'm sure that is true even after the deductions for our mistakes. I'm not sure what to make of your suggestion that my patriotism is 'hubris'. Does that mean you don't think you have 'hubris'? If you don't have 'hubris' ... does that mean your less patriotic?


Not that you care, but I'll give you a bit of credit for being concerned about the border, unless I misunderstood you previously. If your worried about illegals you can't be all bad. I just can't get past your isolationist stance. I'm tempted to rant at you some more, but I'm going to stop myself because you already know how I feel and calling you fresh names won't change a thing between us.


We see the world very differently. I don't know you personally, but I feel the views you express seem extremely dangerous to the USA. It is alien to me to think that we should try to, or could even possibly get away with isolationism in the modern age.


Try a house! Not a body, but a house!  You keep smelling smoke. your roomates tell you it's nothing, but you kep smelling the smoke, and it smells like charred wood, not singed toast. You want to keep searching the house, because you all live there, and if a fire got going, you could all lose your home. but nobody appointed you to be the household fire inspector. Go one step further. Its not a house, its the world, and that smoke is getting stronger, and thicker, and the french guy keeps telling you its nothing, but you know it must be something ...


You and I aren't going to agree. We might as well duel to the death


Stay warm under your blanky, and I'll see you around.


USA, all the way! It's the only way for me!


Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 21, 2007 07:08 AM (2OHpj)

13 Ken Poop:


Washington would have executed a maggot like you for treason--and you know it. He admired Jews as high achievers and for being God's chosen people, by the way.


Don't you dare cite him as a kindred soul, you repugnant piece of slime.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 22, 2007 02:00 AM (Dt3sl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
42kb generated in CPU 0.0382, elapsed 0.0784 seconds.
34 queries taking 0.0695 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.