February 05, 2007
Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.Dr. Ball believes that current trends indicate we may soon enter a cycle of global cooling. He considers these cycles natural and outside the control of technology.
Fair Warning: the link for Dr. Ball's article has some of the most obnoxious popup ads ever.
Posted by: Bluto at
11:51 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
As with everything else, follow the money trail. The 'scientists' who scream the loudest are the ones who have the most federal grant dollars to lose.
Posted by: slug at February 05, 2007 01:05 PM (fvW9X)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2004230,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=11
Scientists have the most to lose? I'd say it is the oil and gas industry.
Posted by: PugWort at February 05, 2007 01:10 PM (heS+8)
I find Dr. Ball's certainty to be unsupported by his article and his willingness to reference Michael Crichton somewhat laughable but the fact that he was slandered by David Suzuki is a plus in my book and it exposes the "there is no legitimate descent" argument as a lie.
Posted by: Chuck at February 05, 2007 01:27 PM (SExR4)
Yet, I see there is no response to the constant back-and-forth of scientists' opinion of global-warmimg and global-cooling every few years. Tell your boys to provide some proof and, maybe, stick with one argument.
Federal grant dollars. Try some research to that as related to those crying about global warming instead of providing a link to The Guardian. Yeah, there's an independent source.
Posted by: slug at February 05, 2007 01:37 PM (fvW9X)
Posted by: Jesusland Carlos at February 05, 2007 03:01 PM (8e/V4)
I think there's a 50/50 chance it's true. LOL!
Posted by: Hucbald at February 05, 2007 04:12 PM (wXveM)
Posted by: w3 at February 05, 2007 04:18 PM (9TtwK)
Posted by: civil behavior at February 05, 2007 09:43 PM (d0Z5T)
As oppossed to Al Gore of the "friends of Occidental Oil, and Communism" group!
HA HA HA HA HA HAH!
USA all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 05, 2007 10:47 PM (2OHpj)
I could actually feel sorry for you if you had an excuse for being so ill informed. You obviously have a computer so the only other excuse is that you desire to remain willfully ignorant. There is no feeling sorry for rednecks.
Posted by: civil behavior at February 06, 2007 09:22 AM (d0Z5T)
Posted by: JOHN RYAN at February 06, 2007 11:13 AM (TcoRJ)
Some people manage to make it cool to be called an 'ill informed redneck'. I'm neither, but considering the source, I'm flattered
As to whether there is any substance to the claims I make about Al Gore, I suggest genuinely curious readers just use your favorite search engines and check out who, and what I'm talking about. Then if you feel like it you can feel sorry for Al Gore's devoted drones.
If you call them on it they will call you ill-informed, and a redneck, but don't let that bother you, because it's just an intimidation tactic.
Add "Armand Hammer", to your search, and also "Midieval warm period". If that doesn't stir up some controversy I'd say you weren't trying.
If you don't look at both sides of the global warming isssue, it is exactly like looking out your window, and deciding the earth is flat. If you want to find out what the earth really looks like you have to leave your house, and do some moving around. get to a mountaintop where you can see the curve of the horizon.
Right now, the global warming alarmists are telling you that what you see outside the window is the wole story, except they are the ones who landscaped that yard your looking at. So "JOHN RYAN" makes an unintended point. You should go out and get more information, instead of just sitting there.
Use your search engine, and look up articles and information about who is disputing the "consensus" of the alarmists. Read what they have to say, and see how they have analyzed the alarmists dogmas, and faulty models. Don't be "ill informed" and just accept what you are told by Al Gore and his attack dogs.
And by all means DO check out "Timothy Ball" and the "Friends of Science" because after all, I am more concerned that you readers get the whole story, than just the parts that the alarmists have pre-approved for you. make up your own mind after seeing BOTH sides. Thats the way good decisions are made.
USA, all the way!
Posted by: Michael Weaver at February 07, 2007 06:49 AM (2OHpj)
There is no feeling sorry for White suburban punks with the lowest standardized test scores in American history. Go back to your rap CDs, video games and your parents' low expectations. The grown ups are having a conversation.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 07, 2007 07:53 AM (Dt3sl)
You would know about the Earth being flat. Your mullah masters already issued a religious edict claiming it was so. Maybe thay can issue an edict on anthropogenic warming, too.
You wait for the Earth to cook like a giant pizza. The rest of us are addicted to reality.
Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 07, 2007 07:56 AM (Dt3sl)
Posted by: celexa at May 20, 2007 01:37 AM (EiWnq)
Posted by: xanax at May 21, 2007 01:06 PM (EiWnq)
34 queries taking 0.1065 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.