Let's be honest. All humorous IMPORTANT ACTION ALERTS and rants aside, John Edwards has no chance to win the Presidency, let alone the nomination. He never did - he's a joke. A joke living in a huge, patriarchical estate, but a joke never the less.

First of all, everyone take a deep breath - the election isn't for almost two years.

No matter how many nutroots threaten refuse their support for him (if it was really there to begin with), there simply aren't enough of them to really make a difference in the general election.

And lets pretend that Edwards does win the nomination. Do you really think any of the nutroots are going to sit out a chance to vote against a GOP Presidential candidate in a critical election? The nutroots shot their wad in 2004 on Kerry and still lost by 3 million votes. Now they think they're going to sit out an election in 2008 because John Edwards canned two staff bloggers two years back?

Puh-lease.

The feminimrods he hired and fired won't really have an impact on his chances, because they speak to a limited and quite frankly fickle part of the electorate for the Democrats. And they aren't making any converts.

Its Ned Lamont all over again. Lotsa hope and hype, little substance when it comes to the long and hard slog of the general election.

Step away from the keyboards and wipe the spittle from the screens, nutroots. Take a mental health day. We'll all be here when you get back.

Posted by: Good Lt. at 08:05 AM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 261 words, total size 1 kb.

1 On a side note I'm really looking forward to watching Hillary gut Edwards like a fish during the primaries. It's going to be ugly and entertaining.

Posted by: blackflag at February 08, 2007 09:56 AM (Mq5jS)

2 For the nutroot leftards, every day is election day. Usually with those dastardly republicans stealing the election, primarily by screwing up the voting machines and causing long lines in precincts run by Democrats.

Damn that Diebold!

Posted by: William Teach at February 08, 2007 07:14 PM (doAuV)

3 stop parroting leftard comments and make up some wingnut ones, and BY GOD I HATE THESE STUPID BUZZWORD REFERRALS TO THE OTHER SIDE. THEY ARE JUVENILE AND ANNOYING.

Posted by: Jake at February 08, 2007 08:04 PM (AeRA2)

4 "feminimrod" is copyrighted to me, thankyouverymuch.

What's stopping you from making them up, Jake?

Posted by: Good Lt at February 08, 2007 08:44 PM (D0TMh)

5 i cant handle em they're sooooo annoying... its like thos kids on those goddamn shoes with wheel in them, i get so pissed when i see one rolling around in target or some other store. its like WHAT THE FUCK!?!? IS WALK TOO FUCKING GOOD FOR YOU YOU LITTLE BITCH!!!?!?

but i dont say that because im usually a fairly reasonable guy.

Posted by: Jake at February 08, 2007 08:57 PM (AeRA2)

6 I'm calling the ACLU, I think Jake is infringing on my civil liberties.

Insert the F word at random points

Posted by: William Teach at February 08, 2007 09:13 PM (doAuV)

7 Fake:


"im usually a fairly reasonable guy."


Obviously.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 09, 2007 08:32 AM (Dt3sl)

8 John Edwars doesn't have any better chance than that asshole Al Sharpton. But they do recieved a large ammount of tax payers dollars for attempting to run. Wth Sharpton that is the game he plays.

Posted by: greyrooster at February 09, 2007 08:34 AM (ap7th)

9

"im usually a fairly reasonable guy."


Obviously.

your marvelous irony went over my head.

Posted by: Jake at February 09, 2007 08:46 PM (AeRA2)

10 Jakeass:


Is there anything above a 13 year old's level that doesn't go over your pointy head?


You really are a masochist, aren't you?

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 10, 2007 01:38 PM (Dt3sl)

11 "Jakeass:


Is there anything above a 13 year old's level that doesn't go over your pointy head?


You really are a masochist, aren't you?"

no, i just like seeing you shoot yourself in the foot.

Posted by: Jake at February 11, 2007 05:08 PM (AeRA2)

12 Jakeass:


Do you have a relevant point to make about Pandagone or anything else?



That was a rhetorical question.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 12, 2007 06:41 PM (Dt3sl)

13 oh you must have missed it, it was right next to the comment you replied to

"actually i have an honest question. if you were offered the position of
head blogger at some nice gop candidate's site, would you do it? and
then later take heat for the number of times you outrageously
proclaimed outrageous things? oh wait, it wouldn't come up... what with
the right wing media and all..."

like to posts down.

Posted by: Jake at February 12, 2007 09:44 PM (AeRA2)

14 Still waiting for something besides a locical fallacy.

Posted by: Jeff Bargholz at February 13, 2007 03:03 PM (Dt3sl)

Hide Comments | Add Comment