Above is a map which bears the flag (upper right corner) of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), al Qaeda's front group, captured by U.S. troops near Samara last month. It shows what the ISI claims is al Qaeda contolled territory. This is what al Qaida claims, not what the Administration claims.
Just keep that in mind, and be sure to point this out to those questioning the extent of al Qaeda's presence in Iraq. Gateway Pundit compares al Qaeda's map with reality here.
Senate Staffer : "The White House is not engaging [on Iraq] even 1/2 as much as they did on immigration"
via Kathryn Lopez at The Corner.
News stories like this make me wonder whether we'll be able to stop the march of surrender.
I do believe, however, we can at least slow it down. Even if we ultimately lose the struggle, it seems that we will have at least bought our troops more time to do what they need to do in Iraq. Whether that will ultimately matter in the grand scheme of things, I don't know.
What I do know is that millions of Iraqis have defied bloodthirsty militant Islamists to engage in a grand experiment in democracy. They did this because we gave them hope. They did this because we promised them
We are here for you. We will protect you. We will not let you down.
Because of our promises, the Iraqis have gone through hell on earth. They've endured torture, and suicide bombings, and targeted killings. In some villages, just being seen talking to a U.S. soldier can carry a death sentence, and yet many have still cooperated. They've cooperated because we promised them
We are here for you. We will protect you. We will not let you down.
My friends, our nation is preparing to send a new message to the Iraqis:
Oops! We changed our mind. Good luck!
Even if you are not pursuaded by the moral questions raised by our behavior, surely you can understand what this spectacle will do to the morale of pro-Western forces in places like Iran and Pakistan. When the going gets tough, the Ameriki will get out of dodge. That will be the lasting lesson of our premature withdrawal from Iraq--and it will be a lesson not soon forgotten.
Posted by: Ragnar at
10:55 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
The al Qaeda Occupation Forces
I never thought I'd live to see the day when I could honestly say that the words of the leader of the 1920s Revolution Brigades brought tears to my eyes.
"This is a free area. We will not allow any kind of occupation. And even al Qaeda, we consider them an occupation force." --- Abu Ali to Michael Yon.
I believe that after four years of fighting that we have finally found a winning slogan.
Al Qaeda is an occupation force. Hat tip: Andy Breitbart
Posted by: Rusty at
11:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
Haditha Case 'Unsupported by Independent Evidence'
A hearing officer in the Haditha case has recognized the absurdity of the persecution prosecution's case and recommends dropping the charges:
more...
Posted by: Bluto at
10:10 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Rusty, From the following report one infers that the thugs/murderers of the Islamic Republic are engaging in tit-for-tat moves against the United States: Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Mooney a military attache with the US Embassy in Cyprus went missing a few days back and now has turned up dead. G_d rest his soul! My sympathies to his family.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at July 05, 2007 03:44 PM (j97MF)
Michael Yon: Islamic State of Iraq/al-Qaeda Atrocitys
My apologies for not picking this up earlier. Michael Yon is embedded with US forces in Baqubah. They are coming across all kinds of evidence of al-Qaeda in Iraq's brutal treatment of the Iraqi people.
Mr. Yon is concerned that these war crimes by the enemy are being ignored by the main stream media. I can understand his frustration, we have been exposing these types of crimes for years.
Via Michael Yon: Since the publication of “Bless the Beasts and Children†many questions have arisen: some of which I can and will answer here, and some whose answers lie elsewhere.
Today, late afternoon on 3 July in Baqubah, Colonel Hiduit from 2nd Brigade 5th Iraqi Army was able to provide some additional details about the murders, as the ongoing investigation begins to yield more facts. The name of the village was not on any maps I examined while preparing the dispatch, but Colonel Hiduit said the name is al Hamira. Coordinates to the area of the gravesites are MC 679 381.
In my dispatch, I reported that six people were killed, but mentioned that Iraqi soldiers were still digging out bodies when I left. A few hours ago, Colonel Hiduit put the number at 10-14, and said the search for bodies had ended. I made video of the graves, bodies and of interviews with Iraqi and American soldiers while we still were at the scene and have been working to make material from this available on this website.
1
Im sorry. I was told these were freedom fighters. Must recheck my program......
Posted by: RicardoVerde at July 03, 2007 08:51 PM (pqO2r)
2
Oh, it was probably just an AQI pot party that got out of hand. Boys will be boys ....
Posted by: Brian H at July 03, 2007 08:58 PM (ahcA3)
3
BTW, the true meaning of MSM is "Mighty Selective Media". But maybe as their decline makes them less Mighty, they'll have to become less Selective. Lets keep pushing ... the wall is starting to crack and wobble.
Posted by: Brian H at July 03, 2007 09:19 PM (ahcA3)
4
But Bo says the Marines are the ones mistreating the Iraqis. Just don't know who to believe?
Posted by: greyrooster at July 03, 2007 10:23 PM (visiI)
MSM Replaces Term, Obvious Signs of Torture (updated/bumped)
The MSM has replaced the phrase, "obvious signs of torture" with "beheaded".
AP Via Yahoo News: BAGHDAD - Twenty beheaded bodies were discovered Thursday on the banks of the Tigris River southeast of Baghdad and a car bomb killed another 20 people in one of the capital's busy outdoor bus stations, police said.
The beheaded remains were found in the Sunni Muslim village of Um al-Abeed, near the city of Salman Pak, which lies 14 miles southeast of Baghdad.
The bodies — all men aged 20 to 40 — had their hands and legs bound, and some of the heads were found next to the bodies, two officers said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information.
Several outlets have used the term beheaded this morning including NPR and WAPO.
I'd praise them for finally doing so, except for the fact that they are about 3 years late.
What gives? Opinions?
Update 06/30/07: Whoa! Fake Alert! Interesting, a fake decapitation story. The terrorists in Iraq regularly claim to have beheaded people and I'm sure they still do at times. After all choppin off heads is second only to soccer as sport in the Arab world.
What really sucks is all those times people really were beheaded the MSM chose to say, "obvious signs of torture." The only time they actually used the word beheading was in a badly sourced, fake story.
The Associated Press, Reuters, and a small Iraqi Independent news agency called Voice of Iraq released stories Thursday about the massacre of 20 men near Salman Pak, who were supposedly found decapitated on the banks of the Tigris River.
But something seemed inherently wrong with the accounts I read from the Associated Press. The only two sources for the Associated Press article were anonymous police, not located in Salman Pak, but from Baghdad (more than dozen miles away) and Kut (more than 75 miles away).
Because of this odd sourcing, I asked Multi-National Corps-Iraq and the PAO liaison to the Iraqi Ministry of the Interior to investigate.
This is a rhetorical way for them to emphasizie their belief that the Surge is not working. The press can say "See, now people are being beheaded. This is an escalation."
Posted by: Kalifornia Kafir at June 28, 2007 12:12 PM (OXdbo)
2
"insurgents" don't behead. terrorists do. we're also aware that ap, beeb, reuters, etc have some of their news filtered by arabic/muslim editors due to the business model they are using (selling finished pieces directly to the mideast, rather than the raw footage they sell to Western sources). 20 beheaded bodies fits nicely into the "surge isnt working," as the above comment points out. Being found in a Sunni village outside Salmon Pak sends up red flags for me.
Short answer: anonymous sources are either wrong/lying/propagandizing, and publishing it as such serves to further the source's agenda (see above)
Posted by: cadetwithchips2 at June 28, 2007 01:01 PM (FPAKD)
3
This is what I love about the whole coming surge debate -- the ambiguity.
Take a group of 100,000 terrorists -- any 100,000 will do -- and kill 30,000 between now and late September.
Those who support the war will be able to claim 30,000 dead as proof the surge is working. Those who do not will be able to point to the fact that 70,000 terrorists are still roaming free despite the surge, proving it's failure.
I think everyone will find what they're looking for at the end of the day.
Posted by: B at June 28, 2007 02:52 PM (Zlbra)
4
Muslims are screwed up assholes. What's with this cutting peoples heads off anyway? If I were killing muslims I would just shoot the bastards in the head and go on to the next. Takes too much time to cut their heads off. Inefficent.
Posted by: Greyrooster at June 28, 2007 10:40 PM (jYwnY)
5
The thing with cutting peoples heads off sure seems like it's what the book of Revelations is talking about.
Accept the mark on your forehead, or they'll cut your head off.
7
"Confirmation" of anything in Iraq is problematical. About the only thing that is consistently accurate is the American KIA figures. Other than that EVERYTHING is suspect to me.
Posted by: John Ryan at June 30, 2007 10:54 PM (TcoRJ)
8
Entire beheading incident probably never happened.
Posted by: Greyrooster at July 01, 2007 01:02 PM (LypZL)
9
Howie: Will you please publish Conservative Voices' IP so I can piss on him.
Posted by: Greyrooster at July 01, 2007 08:03 PM (7hGJW)
10
I'm not convinced the two terms are interchangeable. If the jihadists used screwdrivers, blowtorches, etc. from their gruesome torture manuals BEFORE sawing off someone's head then just saying "beheaded" doesn't quite cover it. Maybe the MSM should just try to be very descriptive by saying "tortured and beheaded". Using toned down language with these sanitized euphemisms doesn't accurately convey the utter savagery and sadistic glee with which our enemies behave.
Posted by: Jill at July 02, 2007 10:32 AM (j/eWI)
11
Remember how those two valiant reporters from Fox joined the Muslim religion...to save their heads?
Pussies will do anything to stay alive! Men are supposed to fight; some live, some die...it's in our genes.
Language is for lawyers, those pussies who study to become skilled in the passive aggressive ways slimeballs love!
Take the recent immigration bill...a lawyer's wet dream for sure!
Muslims are assholes, that's simple...and true. Religion of peace, yea, I see their leaders out on the streets every day asking, begging for peace!
Put some lipstick on that pig for me, will ya? I've got some dancin' to do! Ain't she pretty?
Ali Hassan al-Majid To Hang
He is also known as Chemical Ali
Via CNN: BAGHDAD, Iraq -- An Iraq court on Sunday sentenced three former aides to Saddam Hussein, including the man known as "Chemical Ali," to death by hanging for their role in a 1980s genocide campaign that that killed up to 100,000 Kurds.
Ali Hassan al-Majid, Hussein's first cousin, earned his nickname for atrocities committed in a military campaign code-named Operation Anfal during the 1980-88 Iraq-Iran war.
In the scorched earth attacks, poisonous gas and chemicals were used against the Kurds.
Also sentenced to death was Sultan Hashem Ahmed, Iraqi army commander during the war with Iran. In 1988, he was named chief-in-charge of the Anfal operation.
The third defendant to hang is Hussein Rashid Mohammed, former deputy general commander of the Iraqi armed force, assistant chief of staff for military operations, and former Republican Guard commander.
A little reminder of why this man needs hanging below the fold.
more...
To defend these, millions have died, because they are worth dying for:
1. Freedom of speech 2. Freedom of worship, and religion 3. Freedom from want, and hunger 4. Freedom From Fear -- the most elusive freedom of all. There is only one way that this one is achieved -- with steel and guts. Pro Patria
Posted by: DemocracyRules at June 23, 2007 11:15 PM (PnMRH)
2
Howie, There's a great deal of truth in that cartoon. The only reason the Mullahcracy desperately does every thing to arm the terrorist in Iraq and now in Afghanistan is that the Mullahs are scared out of their wits! They see themselves as having been flanked by coalition on two sides.
It's time the coalition let the regime of Iran know that the fears of Mullahs are actually well-founded! And they can do this by resolving to kill tens of IRGC/Basiji for every coalition casualty.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 24, 2007 12:20 AM (EdIIN)
3
That cartoon sure beats the crap like DOONSBURY or THE BOONDOCKS or the other liberal crap
Posted by: sandpiper at June 24, 2007 10:22 AM (h6CK1)
4
Sandpiper, aka "Tazi bacheh'baz" It's funny that you show up only when there is post aimed directly at your pay-masters in Tehran.
Your Mullah bosses are NOT long for this world and you know it.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 24, 2007 11:01 AM (EdIIN)
5
If I were Madinthehead, I'd start looking for a nice villa in southern France. 4 carrier strike groups will be off the coast soon... sounds familiar. We will never forget Saudi Arabia, you wait your turn.
Posted by: tbone at June 26, 2007 11:36 AM (HGqHt)
BAGHDAD - The 24 boys found severely malnourished in a Baghdad orphanage have been moved to a different building in the same facility and are being properly cared for, Iraqi officials said Thursday.
Thank you again, the good men of the 82nd Airborne.
Excrement question: What song did the title of this post come from?
Posted by: redc1c4 at June 22, 2007 02:11 AM (HH621)
2
Oh please.."Signs" by the Five Man Electric Band.
"Long haired freaky people need not apply"
The story is so great that I'm afraid that there is another shoe to drop. I'm like a "dog that's been beat too much, spend half your life just-a coverin' up"
Posted by: TBinSTL at June 22, 2007 02:14 AM (MSiPb)
3
You got me, it was "Electrical"....dammit, shoulda googled!
Posted by: TBinSTL at June 22, 2007 02:15 AM (MSiPb)
4
Make a song out of this. Jessie Jackson says he is going to use donations to pay for the college education of the 2 bit nappy headed ho who falsely accused the Duke Lacross players. Support the NAACP the money supports lying whores and buys houses for Jessie Jackson's girlfriend.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 22, 2007 09:04 AM (yhGrC)
Video Point/Counterpoint: al Qaeda vs. U.S. Troops
What the al Qaeda in Iraq front group wants you to see vs. what is really happening on the ground in ongoing operations.
First: Raw footage from the Islamic State of Iraq (the al Qaeda umbrella group). Notice the journalist taking pictures at the beginning of the film, and the way the terrorist pose, as if they're really fighting someone and not just standing around looking "menacing" in their track suits.
Compare that to the videos that follow, and you tell me who looks more menacing.
more...
1
First off. These short videos only show SOME of what is going on in Iraq. The US troops run like cowards when they are attacked by the insurgents. And their not insurgents. They are "Freedom Fighters" and the sooner you dumbasses learn that the better off we'll all be. As for the very last video with the young Iraqi's screaming "Bush good" and "Sadam bad" can be explained very easily. What is not seen is that the so called liberators are holding those kids parents as prisoners. The children's parents will be executed if they fail to say "Bush is good" on camera. Also, the video from the helicopters is very real with one exception. The pilots in the helicopters are freedom fighters and not Americans. Those are the real facts about Iraq.
I'm Harry Reid and I approve this message.
Posted by: Rome at June 21, 2007 05:26 PM (/GrlO)
2
1. whoever you are that wrote the #1 post - you are a jackoff.
2. the last video showing those unabashedly thrilled kids should be sent to every cocksucking democrat and other fools that think the iraq war is for nada. the proof is in the pure ecstasy of those boys.
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at June 21, 2007 06:06 PM (yxcId)
3
I think Rome was being sarcastic there, good dr.
Posted by: Vinnie at June 21, 2007 06:09 PM (eSoLw)
4
too subtle i guess and some things are just not to be shitted about.
rusty was 1000% on that video.
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at June 21, 2007 06:28 PM (yxcId)
5
That last video says it all for me -- our troops are doing something special, and that is something that the MSM and the Left cannot comprehend because they are so filled with themselves.
God bless these children -- your future is safe as long as the soldier stands for all that is good and true, and the American soldier understands this beautifully.
I'm damn proud of you, American soldier.
Posted by: Richard Romano at June 21, 2007 07:00 PM (iD1fP)
6
I suppose the "I'm Harry Reid and I support this message" wasn't clear enough to show my sarcasm of how this war is being reported. For that, you have my sincerest apology. And if I ever hear some lefty asshat call one of our troops a "baby killer" I'll stab him/her in the eye.
Posted by: dr. akim ullshitbay at June 21, 2007 10:36 PM (yxcId)
8
Ice pick is nice, but I don't really care. I'll use a ball point pen if I have to.
Posted by: Rome at June 21, 2007 10:56 PM (/GrlO)
9
Those jihadis have to be the BIGGEST group of clowns I have ever seen. Listening to the one cockbag chant Allahu Snackbars in that monotonous chant over and over made me want to throw my computer against the wall.
Those morons could be outwitted by a paintball team. Its a shame our vastly superior military is being underminded by the media and dhimmicrats and just might face the completely obsurd reality of being "defeated" by this rabble of idiots.
Posted by: Jack's Smirking Revenge at June 21, 2007 11:50 PM (ou0cx)
Video: Puking Up Dead Insurgent's Milky Way
Mental note: if you find a Milky Way candy bar in a dead insurgent's pocket, it's probably best not to eat it. Probably......
more...
Posted by: greyrooster at June 20, 2007 05:06 PM (NOVbS)
2
Replace the soldier chick with the WWE's Rick Flair! Stand back and watch Mr T-Shirt get righteously Bitch Slapped by the Nature Boy!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
Posted by: JihadGene at June 20, 2007 05:35 PM (l8Hl5)
3
I meant RIC Flair...damn....now I gotta bitch slap myself! WOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: JihadGene at June 20, 2007 05:41 PM (l8Hl5)
Posted by: fmfnavydoc at June 20, 2007 10:15 PM (I6QiV)
7I meant RIC Flair...damn....now I gotta bitch slap myself!
Good idea.
It's a little funny, but she's a lot hot.
I half agree. I don't find it too funny, but god damn! is she ever foxy. If I wasn't such a pussy (and have this testicle thing) I'd join up in an instant.
Yeah she’s hot and all, but not to bright. Both those clowns are going to get masted for releasing video-taped-stupidity over the internet. The Army never learns…
Posted by: YourTaxDollarsAtWork at June 21, 2007 11:56 AM (DQNQe)
Troops Kickin' al Qaeda Ass!
Hmmm, what could an al Qaeda bombmaker want with 500 gallons of toilet cleaner? Oh, yeah, chlorine...as in the main ingredient of al Qaeda improvised WMD.
Your War on Terror News in a nutshell, uncensored by the MSM:
more...
1
Kicking ass and to hell with the names. God, I would love to be there.
Posted by: 1sttofight at June 12, 2007 04:32 PM (51r8a)
2
Damn, I bet the Taliban's human pck mules will have sore feet trying to pack a new pile of stuff over the border on foot. All that work down the tubes.
Posted by: Howie at June 12, 2007 04:33 PM (YHZAl)
3"...over two dozen enemy fighters were killed..."
Well done lads; well done.
Posted by: Garduneh Mehr at June 12, 2007 04:39 PM (j97MF)
4
Are you guys going soft on al-Qaeda? You're taking too many alive. If you're after intel do the necessary first then interrogate a Ouija board.
Posted by: westerninfidel at June 12, 2007 05:27 PM (CwLrR)
I keep telling people around me that things in Afganistan and Iraq are becoming more and more positive. Neither is a place that you'd want to go on vacation but it seems that the populations have finally realized that they are going to have to pitch in to earn their freedom. Keep the reports coming.
Peace Breaking Out in Anbar
Of course, USA Today is just a right-wing propaganda machine. That's what Rick Ellensberg and the Nutroots told me. So it must be true.
Anbar province, once among the most violent regions in Iraq, is held up as an example of how local politics can reduce violence. "A year ago we were about to write off Anbar province," Everett said. "We have turned it completely around."
A key part of the turnaround was an effort to work with tribal leaders. A growing number of the leaders, sometimes called sheiks, have joined with U.S. forces and turned against al-Qaeda militants. The average weekly attacks in Anbar province dropped from about 250 last year to about 100 last month, according to the U.S. military. This year 12,000 Iraqis volunteered for Iraqi security forces in Anbar, up from 1,000 in 2006, Odierno said.
"Anbar could be a microcosm of what could happen in the rest of country if the right elements come into play," said Army Col. Ralph Baker, a former brigade commander who served two tours in Iraq and now serves at the Pentagon.
1
Good news about Iraq is now considered suspect even at MPJ. We are now arming the Sunnis, the people who were in control before we liberated Iraq from the Sunnis.
Posted by: John Ryan at June 11, 2007 10:43 AM (TcoRJ)
Err I think we got em. Of course the ISI or the Mahdi Army, whomever these blong to will complain, "They didn't return the Martry's body." Excuse me, I think at least part of him must have made it home right away. Have you checked for anything resembling hamburger on the roof?
Update: Credit where credit is due. I ran across the press release for this video while loooking around this morning. These were Mahdi Army thugs who bought the farm.
Via MNF-Iraq.com: CAMP LIBERTY, Iraq — Attack helicopter crews from the 1st “Attack†Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment, 1st Air Cavalry Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, in a coordinated operation with the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, killed four terrorists, apprehended six suspects and destroyed one van and multiple rockets that were aimed toward the International Zone in eastern Baghdad June 2.
The Apache helicopter team was alerted to the area when terrorists were spotted setting up multiple rocket firing positions aimed at the International Zone.
“This operation against an enemy rocket team shows the awesome capability and lethality my aircrews display every day,†said Lt. Col. Christopher Walach, commander of the 1-227th Aviation Regiment.
In all, four terrorists were killed, one vehicle destroyed and 10 rockets destroyed in the Apache Longbow engagement. There was no collateral damage observed during the engagement.
Following the destruction of the equipment by the attack helicopters, Soldiers with the 82nd Airborne Division’s 2nd Brigade Combat Team pursued six suspects observed fleeing the scene of the foiled rocket attack. They tailed the suspects to a residence inside Sadr City and apprehended them.The six suspects were then transported to the nearby Sadr City Joint Security Station for questioning.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 07, 2007 11:55 PM (23jdi)
7
Maybe I'm wrong here but I think the pilots or those who are doing the shooting messed up. Yes, we do want that truck and the launchers taken out. That's obvious. But, there were three or four guys off to the left stanting out there like they were waiting for orders on what to do. I think, you take the men out first, then you hit the weaponry. I'll give our guys a B+ for a grade on this one, which can be upgraded to an A if they later took out the men which was not shown on this video.
Iraqis Fight al Qaeda, Call For US Help
Here's a story that somehow slipped through the censors:
BAGHDAD - A battle raged Thursday in west Baghdad after residents rose up against al-Qaida and called for U.S. military help to end random gunfire that forced people to huddle indoors and threats that kept students from final exams, a member of the district council said.
Update: Omar at Iraq the Model has talked to friends in the area, and says that the AP has mischaracterized the fighting, and that the groups are actually opposing insurgent bands:
The two groups, teams actually, were later identified; on one side there's al-Qaeda and the Islamic state in Iraq and on the other there's the Islamic army and 'Jaish al-Mujahideen' (The brigades of the 1920 revolution in another account), the latter are know to be largely military and intelligence officers of the former regime as well as members of the Baath Party.
Hmmm, maybe we should help both sides.
Omar still considers AQ in Iraq to be in a bad way:
Either way, al-Qaeda is under pressure on more than one front and it has lost a bunch of its commanders and fighters and this is always good news.
1
l <a href="http://iraqthemodel.blogspot.com/2007/05/red-on-red-in-amiriyah.htm">IraqTheModel</a> says it's insurgents fighting insurgents.
Posted by: guy at May 31, 2007 06:15 PM (kVfAR)
2
It doesn't really matter if it's red on red, if one side is a nationalist insurgent organization, and the other is a terrorist cell? The U.S is not interested in bringing the latter to the table, but wishes to reconcile nationalists under the rule of law.
Rep. Paul and the Founders versus Our Interventionist Elite
by Michael Scheuer
America’s bipartisan governing elite never expected their common interventionist foreign policy to be damned by a man who has long worked among that august group. But Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) proved himself not only a political maverick, but one of the few elected federal officials who still prizes – indeed, treasures is a better word – his status as an American citizen. Rep. Paul does not view himself as a citizen of the world who deems unrelenting U.S. intervention abroad as the acceptable price the world demands of America for this higher form of citizenship. Rep. Paul rejects that price, which is, of course, enormously expensive in monetary terms, as well as in terms of the blood of American kids, most of whose parents and other kin are seldom if ever found in the country’s governing elite.
In the Republican debate in South Carolina, Dr. Paul had the unmitigated gall to tell his fellow candidates the exact truth: America was attacked by Islamists on 9/11, and untold other times since Osama bin Laden declared war on us in 1996, because of the United States government’s foreign policies and their impact in the Muslim world over the last thirty-five years. Dr. Paul then consigned to history’s trashcan the motivations assigned to bin Laden and his ilk by the Bush and Clinton administrations; the nine other Republican candidates; the eight please-don’t-ask-us-about-what-Ron-Paul-said Democratic presidential candidates; most of the media; and the think tanks, left, center, and right. Quite correctly, Rep. Paul deep-sixed – hopefully forever – the idea that our Islamist enemies are attacking us because of our freedoms, liberties, elections, freedom of speech, and gender equality.
In response to Rep. Paul, Rudy Giuliani – is there a more unctuous, ill-informed, and arrogant man in American politics? – dismissed the idea that we were attacked for being "over there" as, in his opinion, "absurd." Giuliani added that he had never before heard such an analysis, demanded Dr. Paul retract his words, and clearly implied that Dr. Paul was unpatriotic. In other words, Giuliani applied the usual crude denigration reserved for any American citizen who dares question the establishment’s self-serving interventionism.
Sadly for Americans, Giuliani probably was telling the truth, both for himself and the American governing elite. None of the elite’s denizens appear to have heard, read, or even sensed anything that runs counter to the Muslims-hate-us-for-our-freedoms dictum that became revealed scripture on 9/11 and which, in truth, has governed the elite’s perceptions of and actions in the Muslim world for decades. Dr. Paul is right, our governing elite are obsessed with searching abroad for dragons to destroy, especially Islamic dragons; they thereby ignore the Founders’ clear warning that such activity all but assures the ruin of our republic.
Soon after the debate, the bone-deep interventionism of both parties focused on by Rep. Paul was underscored for Americans by the spending bill for the Iraq war passed by Congress and signed by President Bush. The bill allowed the intervention in Iraq to continue until at least September and showed there is no real difference between the two parties; the Republicans want to continue pursuing the military option, while the Democrats argue the military option has failed and there must now be a U.S.-dominated political solution. Neither party wants to leave Iraq; each just has its own view of how the intervention should be managed. And they cynically have stage-managed the next three months so that each will have ammunition – in the form of dead U.S. military personnel – to support their agendas when the next Iraq spending bill is debated. The Republicans will argue that the "surge" has been costly in lives but is succeeding and cannot be given up; the Democrats will argue the surge has failed and the high number of U.S. dead show that we must find a political settlement. Odds are the next spending bill will be signed and leave the situation substantially unchanged because no one – save Rep. Paul – really wants to get out of Iraq. Indeed, there is every chance that the next presidential election will come and go and we will still be in Iraq because the gentleman from Texas is the only presidential candidate who is not a rank interventionist.
Faced with this reality, the struggle to make Americans face facts on foreign policy must be fought now and the spark struck by Rep. Paul fanned into a fire. Make no mistake, the United States is fighting and losing a growing war against al-Qaeda and its allies. And our evolving defeat is not the result of military weakness on our part, or any God-is-on-the-side-of-the-Islamists factor on al-Qaeda’s side. We are losing because we have underestimated the enemy’s strength and motivation thanks to the belief of Mr. Giuliani and our bipartisan elite that Mr. Paul’s assessment of the Islamists’ motivation is "absurd." That belief – which can now be called the "Giuliani Doctrine" – is al-Qaeda’s only indispensable ally and its maintenance is the Islamists only hope for victory.
Our Islamist enemies are motivated by the U.S. policies that have produced America’s military presence in the Muslim world; approval for the repression of Muslims by Russia and China; exploitation of Muslim oil resources; unqualified support for Israel; and a half-century of protecting Arab police states. No American, of course, has to agree with Muslim perceptions of U.S. policies. But perception always is reality, and there is no doubt that most of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims – even those opposed to bin Laden – perceive U.S. foreign policy as an attack on their faith, lands, and brethren. Thus, while our bipartisan governing elite fight a non-existent threat – the freedom-haters and the liberty detesters – the threat fueled by hatred for the impact of U.S. foreign policy grows broader, deeper, and more visceral among Muslims.
What to do? Take Rep. Paul up on his idea of debating the components of U.S. foreign policy that are at issue, not to denigrate their authors and upholders, but to allow Americans to assess whether the policies are doing the only thing they must do – protect America. In this nation there should be nothing too dangerous to talk about; energy, Israel, and our tyrannical Arab "friends" ought to be on the table for thorough, even vitriolic debate. An honest, wide-ranging debate would do two things: (1) It would destroy the myth that Muslims hate us for who we are and how we think and live, and (2) it would help Americans see that U.S. foreign policy has consequences, good and bad, and that Washington’s current policies ensure war with the Islamists for the foreseeable future, and probably much longer.
Might I suggest, therefore, that the next Republican and Democratic debates focus on a single proposition, and that proposition be taken from the finest book on the history of U.S. foreign relations published in the last quarter century, Walter A. MacDougall’s, Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World since 1776. In the debates, the proposition before the house for discussion – to adapt the words of Dr. MacDougall – should be:
"Foreign policy defines what America is at home and is the instrument for preserving and expanding American freedom at home. Foreign policy conducted in the form of crusades for democracy or other ideologies abroad belie America’s ideals, violate its true interests, and sully its freedom. The Founders never intended foreign policy to impose their values beyond America’s own land and waters. None of the Founders perceived a mortal conflict between morality and the national interest; indeed, foreign policy is moral when it is in the national interest."
Initially, such a debate would amount to Dr. Paul against all comers, but Dr. Paul would be quickly joined by tens of millions of Americans when they hear the fatuous, theory-stuffed attempts by the seventeen other candidates to justify the profligate waste of American lives, treasure, and security for exactly the kind of ideological crusading – democracy, freedom, human and women’s rights, etc. – the Founders not only warned against, but damned. At debate’s end it would be clear to Americans that their self-appointed, inbred emperors have no clothes. And the way then would be clear to think about a foreign policy that protects American liberty at home and genuine U.S. interests abroad, and one that is not the republic-destroying play thing of our elite interventionists and the interest groups, foreign lobbies, and domestic military industries that fund their election campaigns.
Posted by: Bo at June 01, 2007 08:57 AM (Ywo+X)
4
Bo: once again looking at politics and not history! The aggression by Islamic nations against the West began long before we ever dug an oil well, or put soldiers into their "hallowed" ground. Islam was spread by the sword to numerous nations, Al Andalus ring any bells?
How then do you explain Thailand, which Arab country did they intervene with to now lose over two thousand Buddhist citizens to Islamic terrorism?
How about Morocco? India? Philippines? Sudan? Algeria? Turkey? Jordan? Indonesia? All of these countries have civilians killed by Islamic terrorists --what were their sins Bo? what did they do with their "foreign policy" to deserve terrorist attacks against their citizens?
In the period of 2001-2003 there were 674 attacks in India, in the last 3 months there have been 124 attacks on Buddhists in Thailand, it must be all of their interventionist policy chickens, coming home to roost eh?
Posted by: davec at June 01, 2007 02:19 PM (kcDpP)
5
I would say Islamic aggression breeds wherever there is massive poverty - similar to the way communism used to.
How did we defeat communism? Was there direct military involvement with the USSR - no.
The Pope
The Beatles
Afghanistan
And the Arms Race
They slew the beast.
Soft power by America can be much more effective in the long run.
Posted by: Bo at June 01, 2007 07:48 PM (euN4c)
6
Davec: If you continue to publish such facts, Rusty is going to get pissed at you. He likes to watch the super bowl with muslims. To him most muslims are moderate and peaceful. Yep! And most rats don't bite. So fill your house with them.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 01, 2007 07:51 PM (XSUF4)
7" I would say Islamic aggression breeds wherever there is massive poverty"
The "poverty" and "oppression" angle of terrorism has been proven false over and over again, in Iraq for example numerous Saudi citizens that engaged in suicide bombings where wealthy, or middle class.
As for Oppression and Poverty, well when was the last time you heard of a Tibetan monk blow up civilians in China?
It's all in the Koran.
Posted by: davec at June 01, 2007 11:50 PM (kcDpP)
So Davec, do we march around the world forcing people to give up their Koran (at gunpoint)? What exactly is your plan to stamp out Islam?
There is such a thing as a moderate muslim you know. The problem now is that the war of choice has maginalized a good chunk of them and been a boon for the radicals.
Posted by: Bo at June 02, 2007 08:10 AM (euN4c)
9
The only thing to stop Islam in it's current form is a reformation: however there is no Martin Luther for Islam, it is completely decentralized unlike the Catholic church, with Mufti's and Mullah giving different interpretations of the Koran and the Hadith as they see fit.
I find it ironic how you perceive that War, will somehow force these "moderate Muslims" into violence; When Christians fought Muslims in Sulawesi did Christians flock to fight a 'crusade' against Muslims in that region? or collect money for arms to assist the Christians? How about the War in the Balkans did that marginalize other European Christians into a 'Holy War' against Muslims?
Why is that? Wake up and smell the Jihad.
Posted by: davec at June 02, 2007 02:27 PM (kcDpP)
4
You will never see that in any of the liberal left-wing rags like the NYTs
Posted by: sandpiper at May 31, 2007 02:53 PM (LKIJT)
5
Its a shame you also wont find it on any news channel news .
Posted by: gandolf101 at May 31, 2007 03:44 PM (hu6V4)
6
And Rosie says American soldiers are murdering Iraqi civilians. Sure looks like to me that at least some Iraqis trust our boys more than their own people.
But of course the Left says that the Iraqis want us out right now.
Posted by: JoiseyMafia at May 31, 2007 03:45 PM (6l2pd)
7
"...because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Posted by: mojo at May 31, 2007 04:37 PM (g1cNf)
8
My Grandma must have had similar feelings of absolute trust to GI's who were stationed in England during the war. She talks about them today with much affection. Good job your men are prepared to stand up against nazis in all guises
Posted by: Liam at May 31, 2007 06:00 PM (9qmUi)
9
Little shit knows who to run to when there's trouble. Now if the American Soldiers was dead he would celebrate with the other kids and burn the body after cutting the head off and using it for a soccer ball.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 01, 2007 08:16 PM (XSUF4)
greyrooster, that was cruel and uncalled for. I've been to the middle east. To insinuate that they'd all dance on our graves just isn't accurate.
That boy was doing exactly what I'd advise my child to do. Hell, if shit was blowing up, I'd hide behind a soldier, too. Don't tell a soldier I said that, though. They'd have a field day!
12
B the S- Don't sweat greyrooster. He alleges to be a Viet Nam veteran, who used to fire warning shots directly into the faces of children, that dared to request candy or C rations from him. Warning shots?....Yeah, well it warned the other children not to fu*k with him. Take your Thorazine greyrooster.
Posted by: JihadGene at June 02, 2007 09:29 PM (l8Hl5)
13
Yep! That's the Greyrooster. I to have been to the middle east. Several times. Liberal pricks aparently forget pictures on this blog in the past. What I said is true. Where were you pussies when the same people danced in the street at 9/11. Fuck ya! Put a rag on your heads and go live where your heart is.
Posted by: greyrooster at June 03, 2007 09:39 AM (vp5rw)
It's On in Sadr City....again
With Sadr back in Iraq, only bad things can happen. I'm not sure why we didn't kill him long ago. I almost hesitated and said that it was probably too late to kill him, that he's too entrenched and that his death would almost certainly lead to civil war, but then I have this funny feeling that in a year from now I'll look back and say, how come we didn't kill him last year?
Al Jazeera's original headline said U.S. and British Battle Mahdi Army, but they've since changed it to Sadr's Mahdi army in Iraq clashes:
British and US forces in Iraq have clashed with armed supporters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a major Shia religious leader.
At least five people were killed in a pre-dawn raid in the Sadr City neighbourhood of Baghdad on Saturday, while in the southern city of Basra "a number" of al-Mahdi Army fighters died in an air strike.
The U.S. military in Iraq says Iraqi and coalition forces have detained a suspected terrorist cell leader and killed at least five insurgents during raids in Baghdad's Shi'ite district of Sadr City.
A military statement said the person detained Saturday is believed to be the suspected leader of a cell known for facilitating the transport of weapons and explosives from Iran as well as bringing militants from Iraq to Iran for training....
In the southern city of Basra, military officials said British forces came under attack for more than two hours from insurgents in retaliation for the killing of their leader, Mahdi Army commander Wissam Abu Qader, on Friday.
Bonus: The war on terror is a bumper sticker, there is no al Qaeda in Iraq news:
Separately, U.S-led forces said they killed two terrorists, detained 23 suspected insurgents and destroyed a cache of explosives during operations Saturday against al-Qaida in Iraq, southwest of Taji.
3
We need to deliver a damn strong dose of Sherman's total war to Sadr City, make the price so fucking high eve fanatical Islamic terrorists are unwilling to continue fighting, nothing else is going to get through to these imbeciles.
Posted by: doriangrey at May 26, 2007 12:13 PM (XvkRd)
4
Yeah, he's toast. Maybe a couple of 5000 lb laser-guided bombs aimed at his big ol' turban-head like they did with that other lowlife miscreant with an unpronouncable name, Abu Musab al Zarquawi. Or maybe a special forces operative to sneak up behind him and drive the pointy end of a Strider SMF up into the back of his skull.
Bob Kerrey Takes on the Dhimmi Moonbats
As hard as it may be to believe today, it wasn't that long ago that Kerrey's opinion wasn't that rare in the Democrat Party:
No matter how incompetent the Bush administration and no matter how poorly they chose their words to describe themselves and their political opponents, Iraq was a larger national security risk after Sept. 11 than it was before. And no matter how much we might want to turn the clock back and either avoid the invasion itself or the blunders that followed, we cannot. The war to overthrow Saddam Hussein is over. What remains is a war to overthrow the government of Iraq....
Suppose we had not invaded Iraq and Hussein had been overthrown by Shiite and Kurdish insurgents. Suppose al Qaeda then undermined their new democracy and inflamed sectarian tensions to the same level of violence we are seeing today. Wouldn't you expect the same people who are urging a unilateral and immediate withdrawal to be urging military intervention to end this carnage? I would....
The key question for Congress is whether or not Iraq has become the primary battleground against the same radical Islamists who declared war on the U.S. in the 1990s and who have carried out a series of terrorist operations including 9/11. The answer is emphatically "yes."
This does not mean that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11; he was not. Nor does it mean that the war to overthrow him was justified--though I believe it was. It only means that a unilateral withdrawal from Iraq would hand Osama bin Laden a substantial psychological victory.
I totally agree, of course, though I'll go further than that. Withdrawal from Iraq would hand bin Laden a substantial strategic victory as well. It would represent a defeat for America and a betrayal of those Iraqis who have put their faith, trust and hope in us, and placed their very lives in our hands. That's something that should give every American pause. Read the rest here.
1 Frankly, I'm shocked we can still find the rare Democrat that puts country before party. What he says is obvious and self-evident. But don't expect the Leftards to be moved by this. It's been put just as clearly to them a thousand times before.
2
>I totally agree, of course, though I'll go further than that. Withdrawal from Iraq would hand bin Laden a substantial strategic victory as well.
Is any of that loss the Bush Administration's fault? That maybe there wasn't a way to win Iraq in the first place and that the only sensible move would have been not to invade?
Posted by: salvage at May 22, 2007 11:37 AM (xWitf)
4
Yes, but a withdrawal would allow the Shia, Sunni and Kurds to kill each other without the silly rules of engagement enforced by the USA
let's leave and let Islam eat it's own.
Posted by: Barry at May 22, 2007 12:08 PM (cl1Cf)
5
Here is a great "Surrender Monkey" pix and videos from Move America Forward (BTW Melanie has been banned from PBS). Gotta love it as they use live monkeys.......
http://www.moveamericaforward.org/
Posted by: allahakchew at May 22, 2007 12:19 PM (BrndJ)
6Is any of that loss the Bush Administration's fault? That maybe there wasn't a way to win Iraq in the first place and that the only sensible move would have been not to invade?
Let me put it to you as simply as I can:
Across the political spectrum, no matter what we might disagree about, the one thing we all seem to agree on is that there's a "fire" burning in Iraq. If you can't agree with that metaphor, then I don't really care to hear from you, because you're an idiot.
Now, if you can accept my "fire" metaphor, you have a number of options as to what you should do right now, among them:
1. try to figure out how to put out the fire, or
2. try to figure out who should be blamed for the fire,or
3. start a public campaign to force the "fire department" to leave the fire alone.
It really is just that simple.
Whether or not you choose option 1, I wonder if your choice would be different if it were your own house on fire, or your family's house, instead of a house occupied by a bunch of brown-skinned strangers living in a faraway corner of the world.
7That maybe there wasn't a way to win Iraq in the first place and that the only sensible move would have been not to invade?
That train left the station a long time ago. Fact is we did invade (with Congress's blessing), and there's no taking it back. The question is, therefore, what do we do now. A question, by the way, you and the tards Bob Kerry is talking to wish to avoid.
8thing we all seem to agree on is that there's a "fire" burning in Iraq
There certainly was no "agreement" of the sort.
No, Iraq was not a "fire" it was a typical third world dictatorship and a threat to no one save the people who lived within her borders.
See the lack of WMD? No fire. No threat to America, no reason to invade.
And if it was a fire than your Dear Leader's solution was to walk up with a giant can of aviation fuel ignoring the people screaming "What the hell are you doing?!?!" He then poured it all over the fire and as the flames got higher and higher he turned and faced the people with a huge grin on his face yelling "Yeeehawwww! Mission Accomplished!"
Furthermore it's cute the way you don't want to blame anyone but considering the stack of bodies that gets higher everyday I think blame should be assigned. But that would be the whole responsibility thing, conservatives seem pretty selective when it comes to that these days. Shame it was President Gore that made this mess, I bet you'd been keen on accountability then.
NK, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and a host of other nations were far
greater threats or bigger "fires". They've had a free reign for the last 6 years now.
Not to mention Afghanistan was left unfinished.
you can't agree with that metaphor, then I don't really care to hear from you, because you're an idiot.
Wow, that's quite the debate tactic but it falls apart because your metaphor is inoperable.
Posted by: salvage at May 22, 2007 03:07 PM (xWitf)
fuck off and die asshole. How's that for a debate tactic. Your only concern it to blame, as long as it's Bush, rather than all the Democrats who also voted for the war because your concerns are purely political-- which are lowest of the low when it comes down to it. You care not an ounce for how the outcome of this war will affect your country as long as your shitty little politics are vindicated. You disgust me to the core, you little creep.
10No, Iraq was not a "fire" it was a typical third world dictatorship and a threat to no one save the people who lived within her borders.
Just as I suspected. You're an idiot.
If you weren't an idiot, you'd understand the difference between "was" and "is." You see, the word "was" is used to describe things in the past tense. The word "is," on the other hand, is used in connection with things occurring in the present tense. I am talking about "is" (present tense, relevant to ideal future course of action), while you're obsessed with "was" (past tense, almost completely irrelevant to ideal future course of action.)
You're obsessed with going back and revisiting things done four years ago when they are completely irrelevant to what course of action we should take today. You want to point fingers? Hey, knock yourself out. But can we at least hold off on the recriminations until we've got this fire at least under some sort of control? Can we do that, at least? Is it too much to ask that we let the firemen do their fucking job without the moonbats turning off their water and jumping on their backs while they're trying to do their best to do something positive? Is that so much to ask?
You want me to admit Bush has fucked up? Fine. Bush has fucked up. There it is. You want me to admit that, knowing what we know today, we may not have invaded Iraq if we had it to do over again. I'm willing to admit that's a distinct possibility. I don't owe the Bush administration a damn thing. I have no incentive to defend any of them. Mistakes have been made--a lot of them. But SO F-ING WHAT? Who, other than a bunch of vindictive ninnie peacenik moonbats gives a flying fuck about that today, in 2007, when we have people working and fighting and dying in Iraq and we're trying to figure out what the hell we should do next?
11
Ragnar: Nice speech. Your Solution # (1) Try to. Your Solution # (2) Try to. Your Solution # (3) Start a. Is there a solution in there?
How about telling the world we are tired of the bullshit. That a government/country is responsible for the actions of its people. How about telling them we will retaliate against any country that has its citizenry attack us. We will punish any nation that doesn't do everything in its power to prevent its citizenry or government from harming any American interest. In particularly our homeland. In plan English. We will destroy the infracture of any country that allows its government or citizens to comitt violence against America. THEN DO IT. Their own governments will clean up the mess for us. We had the abilitly to send our enemies back to the stone age. We paid for it. Why not use our technology instead of the lives of our young people? WE BE STUPID because we talk to our enemies in a language they don't understand. I say give them something they will understand. AN EXAMPLE MUST BE MADE IN THE WAR BETWEEN ISLAM AND FREEDOM. I PREFER THE EXAMPLE BE THEM INSTEAD OF US. The distruction of the infracture of Iran will bring about peace. They will cry. They will threaten. But in the end they will behave. And if their friends don't like it. Well, they can join them in riding a donkey to work and cooking on camel dung fires. Just like the good ole days.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 22, 2007 07:58 PM (xGret)
12
Salvage: Why is Nk, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia a big threat to us. North Korea is starving to death. China is our largest trading partner. They are becoming westernized at a tremenous rate. They know trade with America is responsible for their new found wealth and they love it. Russia is at present a joke who can bearly put down inside rebellions. Shit they couldn't whip Afghanistan. Saudi Arabia knows that their kingdom would not exist without America. THE ENEMY IS ISLAM. Not third world gooks or has been Ruskies or never been Saudis. ISLAM is the world's cancer. We must come up with a cure for it. We have a choice. Kill it or contain it. We cannot let it grow or it will kill us. OUTLAW ISLAM
Posted by: greyrooster at May 22, 2007 08:09 PM (xGret)
13
Bob Kerry gets a free pass when he talks military. When he talks politics, the free pass is not available. He deeply admires Bill Clinton. Deeply admires that man.
When Bob Kerry talks politics I see in the shadows Bill Clinton. As to what role ole Bubba is playing, I can't say with certainty. I do "color" Bob Kerry's political thoughts knowing this. I would not offer this man automatic trust, politically.
I remember his work on the 9/11 commission, too...kind of a rubber stamp for the Democratic team out to slam dunk our President and cover their asses, especially during Clinton's time.
FIVE IRAQI HOSTAGES FREED
FIVE IRAQI HOSTAGES FREED
BAGHDAD, Iraq – Five Iraqis who were held captive and tortured by terrorists were freed Monday morning during a Coalition Forces raid on the site where they were imprisoned.
Coalition Forces targeted the building northeast of Karmah during continued operations to disrupt the al-Qaeda network operating in the area. After a thorough search of the building, ground forces found a padlocked room. Inside were four men and a boy who had been kidnapped and severely beaten with chains, cables and hoses. The four captives also showed signs of torture, and the boy stated the terrorists had hooked electrical wires to his tongue and shocked him.
Coalition Forces evacuated the five individuals and provided treatment for their injuries. The hostages indicated their captors were foreign fighters who spoke with different accents. The hostages, who are from different tribes, will be turned over to their respective tribal leaders for repatriation.
“The brutality and viciousness of these acts demonstrate the complete disregard terrorists have for human life,†said Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, MNF-I spokesperson. “We will continue to hunt foreign fighters who bring this violence into Iraq.â€
1Bravo for the good guys! Thanks for the many bits of good news you guys post.
But the msm incants as it chants, "gitmo-abu ghraib-booshitler-cheneyburton-haditha-surrender; gitmo-abu ghraib-booshitler-cheneyburton-haditha-surrender; gitmo-abu ghraib-booshitler-cheneyburton-haditha-surrender."
Oo-hhhmmmmmmmmmm.
Posted by: locomotivebreath1901 at May 21, 2007 04:47 PM (Cy7OH)
2
<blockquote>After a thorough search of the building, ground forces found a padlocked room. Inside were four men and a boy who had been kidnapped and severely beaten with chains, cables and hoses. The four captives also showed signs of torture, and the boy stated the terrorists had hooked electrical wires to his tongue and shocked him.</blockquote>
Hey, that's what Michael Moore's Minutemen are all about.
/Spit.
Posted by: Insomniac at May 21, 2007 05:06 PM (UYKDB)
3
After a thorough search of the building, ground forces found a padlocked room. Inside were four men and a boy who had been kidnapped and severely beaten with chains, cables and hoses. The four captives also showed signs of torture, and the boy stated the terrorists had hooked electrical wires to his tongue and shocked him.
Hey, that's what Michael Moore's Minutemen are all about.
/Spit.
Sorry I screwed up the html tags before...
Posted by: Insomniac at May 21, 2007 05:07 PM (UYKDB)
4
It's amazing that such barbarism continues to attract sympathy from the kooks on the left. These "freedom fighters" are nothing more than cold-blooded murderers--the darkest souls in existence.
MSM, you can go **** yourselves.
Posted by: Richard Romano at May 21, 2007 07:10 PM (iD1fP)
"tortured by terrorists" ??????? WHAT !!!!!! You mean to tell me that these guys aren't operating within the framework of the Geneva Convention!!!!! There must be someone we can sue.
6
There is no solution as long as the west persists in the stupid notion that we must behave better. Bullshit! We must win this war against Islam and we must admit that it is a war with Islam. Shit the west is to politically correct identify the enemy. The enemy is Islam. Islam promotes and applauds the killing, torturing and subjugation of others. All else is bullshit. OUTLAW ISLAM and begin mass deportations.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 21, 2007 08:12 PM (aYDnO)
Terrorist Behind January Murders of Soldiers Killed
The Army Times reports that Azhar al-Dulaimi has been killed:
BAGHDAD — U.S. forces on a raid in northern Baghdad killed a Shiite militant believed to have been the mastermind of a brazen January attack in Karbala that led to the capture and subsequent killing of four U.S. soldiers, the military said Sunday.
Speaking on CNN’s “Late Edition,†Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, the spokesman for the U.S.-led forces in Iraq, said U.S. troops had been pursuing Azhar al-Dulaimi “relentlessly,†since the Jan. 20 attack.
Good riddance. Hope it was a gutshot and took a while for him to die.
1
It is always great news to learn that one of the evil people have been sent away forever!
Now, why is Sandy Berger still allowed to walk American streets?
Do you not think with over 3000 dead American fighting personnel, this former Clinton National Security Advisor should only give up his law license for stealing and destroying documents which we, the citizens of America, have not been told the contents of?
Talk about evil. Any wonder why George "compassionate conservative" Bush is dropping faster than it takes to count to ten in popularity?
And our Congress...what have they done? After three plus years no border control, just a bill that gives 12 million non-americans living in this country illegally their freedom to be citizens...amnesty for sure.
Bring back the draft, but first those elected officials must send their kids into the military...then the rest of us go into the pool. See how they like some of their family blood splattered in some foreign country or lost at some border point that is not defended against those who wish us harm.
Time to build that underground bomb, wmd, shelter.
I will not take Hillary, nor Rosie, nor Al 'n Tipper, nor scrub face Moore, nor Nancy, nor Harry or any other of their ilk into my shelter. Just my favorite twin blow-up doll sisters are going down there with me...
Posted by: RJ at May 20, 2007 05:22 PM (yyxO/)
2
"brazen attack"?! I hate the press. I thought I couldn't hate them as much as I do, but it just keeps growing. Just call me the MSM Hater.
Glad to hear the jihadi wing in hell is getting larger.
Posted by: Stormy70 at May 20, 2007 10:29 PM (7WJsV)
3
We should be going after his family and friends also. Those that cheer and support him should receive the same justice.
Posted by: greyrooster at May 21, 2007 07:49 AM (q7s2f)
A Soldier Needs Our Help
I received this from some folks with Soldier's Angels:
It is time to get out the hammer and nails to help one of our Heros. CPL Jeremy is currently being treated for moderate TBI. He may get to come home soon to his Panama City, FL home but not until their home is repaired. Therein lies the problem! While Jeremy was serving our country his wife was unable to repair the roof of their home. Now the roof needs to be replaced and with the roof in such disrepair there is now water damage inside the house. The lowest estimate on the repairs is almost $13,000. The family simply does not have the money for such a huge expense. If you can help with the repairs, construction, monetarily or know someone what might be able to, please email me.
In the best situation, the men and women of our armed forces are giving up years of their lives for our country. Seems the least we can do is help them when their house is falling apart. If you're in a position to help, monetarily or otherwise, please contact me via email (see contact page) and I'll direct it to the appropriate folks. Thanks.
1
We want to put this up at Hyscience and include a link to your email, but there's no email address listed at contact page for Ragner.
Also, if the roof was damaged by a natural disaster, I might be able to offer some financial help through Catholic Charities.
Let me know.
Posted by: Richard at May 18, 2007 02:09 PM (5VxLK)
2
I rec'd the same email and am donating 50 dollars as I am not in that area, however how great is the response above mine!
Posted by: Jaded at May 18, 2007 03:32 PM (0lpqx)
3
Why are their so many soldiers coming home to this stuff? Where are the rest of the folks that want to support the troops? They are all for taking my political donations but when someone else is handing the hat around they are nowhere to be seen.
I have decided to stop contributing to campaigns. So if you can email details. Maybe I can help this poor guy out.
No guarantees but if its a legit deal I can probably help out significantly.
Posted by: andrew at May 18, 2007 04:05 PM (54so2)
4
My email is still listed under All-Seeing Eye, which was my pseudonym when I started blogging here.
Perspective
Ever wonder what constant hyperbole, years of willful distortion, a chronic lack of proportion, and ongoing inflated one-sided outrage in the mainstream media/Democrat Party looks like? Wonder no more.
Look at the graph below, and then look at any major daily newspaper or newscast.
3
Now post the comparison graph for US deaths in WWII. Then, try to imagine the number of troops we'd have needed to search for missing US soldiers in WWII or Vietnam. Use the base formula of 4000 for every three that were missing, as we are doing right now. The war of misinformation by the MSM and the left is what is losing the war and our soldiers lives in Iraq.
4
yup vietnam. LOL BTW I lost one friend in Iraq on the USS Nimitz in July 03 a man from Laos we all called Sourapple, and a good Navy friend Alvarez recently died after getting into something called DEVGRU while he was in parts unknown. They are who I am celebrating this memorial day.
Posted by: Legrand at May 14, 2007 11:03 PM (/etUv)
5
Can we get a link to the original graph? That one looks distorted due to shrinkage.
Posted by: Wearyman at May 14, 2007 11:31 PM (tu0dd)
7
Please permit the redundant................. Remind your Kids, Grand Kids and anyone who will listen, that what they see the MSM doing in Iraq and to our Armed Forces today, is the same treasonous-defeatist stab in the back of our Armed Forces and Nation that they did in the RVN forty years ago.
Posted by: Rubin at May 15, 2007 01:38 AM (qjMuM)
8
For perspective, overlay the number of traffic fatalities on US roads per month. Not to minimize in the slightest the sacrifice of our armed forces in our country's defense, but we loose over 3,000 every month in the USA to fatal motor vehicle crashes (based on 2005 data).
Posted by: Jon at May 15, 2007 02:02 AM (FDplk)
9
It is a sorry day in hell when our own MSM support the terrorist!
Posted by: allahakchew at May 15, 2007 11:51 AM (BrndJ)
?????
The US anti-American media has supported every single enemy of the United States since the mid 60's, how is what they are doing now any different then what they did during the Vietnam War? If anyone wants a true comparison between Iraq and Vietnam that is the comparison they should make. Journalism the fourth estate America’s true fifth column.